Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
WPW

websocketd VS WP Webhooks Pro

Compare websocketd VS WP Webhooks Pro and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

websocketd logo websocketd

Turn any program that uses STDIN/STDOUT into a WebSocket server. Like inetd, but for WebSockets.

WP Webhooks Pro logo WP Webhooks Pro

Do everything within WordPress without WordPress.
  • websocketd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-27
  • WP Webhooks Pro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-18

websocketd features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Websocketd is straightforward to use, turning any local executable into a WebSocket server. It requires minimal configuration and setup, making it accessible for beginners.
  • Language Agnostic
    Since websocketd can wrap any executable, developers can use it with any programming language they prefer, allowing for flexibility in choosing the right tools for their projects.
  • Lightweight
    Websocketd is a lightweight tool with minimal overhead, making it ideal for projects that require efficient WebSocket communication without the need for a full-featured server.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The ease of setting up websocketd allows developers to quickly prototype WebSocket applications and test new ideas without significant investment in infrastructure.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, websocketd benefits from community contributions and transparency, ensuring continuous improvement and trustworthiness of the software.

Possible disadvantages of websocketd

  • Limited Features
    While its simplicity is an advantage, websocketd's feature set is minimal. It does not provide advanced capabilities such as authentication, performance monitoring, or compression.
  • Lack of Built-in Scalability
    Websocketd doesn't come with built-in support for high scalability or distributed systems, which can be a limitation for applications needing to handle a large number of simultaneous connections.
  • No Native HTTP Support
    Websocketd is focused solely on WebSockets, so it lacks native support for serving regular HTTP endpoints, which may necessitate additional infrastructure for projects requiring mixed communication.
  • Manual Process Management
    Developers have to handle process management manually, which includes ensuring the stability of wrapped programs and addressing issues that arise from resource limits.
  • Community Size
    Compared to more established tools, websocketd has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources in terms of documentation, tutorials, and community support.

WP Webhooks Pro features and specs

  • Automation Capabilities
    WP Webhooks Pro allows you to automate various tasks on your WordPress site by connecting different plugins and services, reducing manual effort and increasing efficiency.
  • Integration with Multiple Services
    The plugin supports integration with numerous third-party services and applications such as Zapier and Integromat, enabling seamless data flow and interoperability between platforms.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    WP Webhooks Pro provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Customizable Options
    It offers a wide range of customizable options that allow users to tailor webhooks according to their specific needs and preferences.
  • Real-time Data Processing
    The plugin facilitates real-time data processing, ensuring that information is transferred and actions are executed promptly as triggered.

Possible disadvantages of WP Webhooks Pro

  • Complexity for Beginners
    For users who are new to webhooks and automation, setting up and configuring the plugin might seem complex and overwhelming.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of WP Webhooks has limited functionality, which might not suffice for users looking for advanced automation features without investing in the Pro version.
  • Potential for Overhead
    Poorly configured or excessive use of webhooks could lead to server overhead, impacting site performance negatively.
  • Dependency on Third-party Services
    Relying heavily on third-party services for automation processes might pose risks if any of these services face outages or change their APIs.
  • Cost Consideration
    The Pro version comes with a cost implication which might not be justifiable for small websites or users with minimal automation needs.

websocketd videos

No websocketd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

WP Webhooks Pro videos

+ Add

How to integrate Zapier with WP Webhooks Pro [Tutorial]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to websocketd and WP Webhooks Pro)

websocketd

WP Webhooks Pro

Developer Tools
38 38%
Developer Tools
62% 62
APIs
32 32%
APIs
68% 68
Internet Of Things
100 100%
Internet Of Things
0% 0
API Tools
0 0%
API Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using websocketd and WP Webhooks Pro. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, websocketd seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

websocketd mentions (4)

  • ht: Headless Terminal
    Reminds me quite a bit of websocketd as well, which converts a stdin/stdout program to a websocket: http://websocketd.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Structured Logging with Slog
    I hadn't even considered collecting traces/spans in this way yet, and have taken the approach of "stuff outputting logs in JSON format to stderr/local file". I usually end up writing a (temporary, structured) log message with the relevant span tags, but wouldn't it would be much better to run the actual trace/span code and be able to verify it locally without the ad-hoc log message? The prototype I built is a web... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • WebSocket to TCP bridge for game servers? Alternative to websockify?
    I also used to use this (http://websocketd.com/) along with netcat(1) before just biting the bullet and writing my own websocket library for our server as we needed to scale up slightly. Source: about 2 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Http://websocketd.com/ (Runs command line C or C++ programs as websocket programs, similar to inetd / CGI). Source: over 3 years ago

WP Webhooks Pro mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WP Webhooks Pro yet. Tracking of WP Webhooks Pro recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing websocketd and WP Webhooks Pro, you can also consider the following products

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

Webhook.site - Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.

Hook Relay - So you want to add webhooks to your app, and after having worked with the webhooks that Stripe provides, you want yours to be as great as theirs.

Beau - No-code platform to build, automate customers' workflows, step-by-step

Oatpp - Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

Loading...