Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WebKit VS WebKitGTK+

Compare WebKit VS WebKitGTK+ and see what are their differences

WebKit logo WebKit

WebKit is a layout engine designed to allow web browsers to render web pages.

WebKitGTK+ logo WebKitGTK+

WebKitGTK+ is the port of the portable web rendering engine WebKit to the GTK+ platform.
  • WebKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-05
  • WebKitGTK+ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-02

WebKit features and specs

  • Open Source
    WebKit is an open-source web browser engine, allowing developers to contribute and adapt the code for their own projects.
  • Performance Optimization
    WebKit is designed to efficiently render web pages, often resulting in fast performance and responsiveness.
  • Cross-Platform
    WebKit is used in various operating systems, including macOS and Linux, allowing for consistency across platforms.
  • Community Support
    Being widely adopted, WebKit benefits from a large community that contributes plugins, extensions, and valuable resources.
  • Strong Security
    WebKit incorporates several security measures and is regularly updated to address vulnerabilities.
  • HTML5 and CSS3 Support
    WebKit has robust support for modern web standards like HTML5 and CSS3, making it suitable for developing rich web applications.

Possible disadvantages of WebKit

  • Limited Browser Diversity
    Many browsers using WebKit may mean less diversity in rendering engines, potentially stifling innovation as they share a common base.
  • Resource Intensive
    WebKit can be resource-heavy, leading to high memory and CPU usage, especially with complex web pages.
  • Inconsistencies Across Implementations
    Different adaptations of WebKit (like those used in different browsers) might introduce inconsistencies in behavior and features.
  • Lag in Feature Updates
    While WebKit is actively maintained, certain new web developments might appear first in other engines, leading to lag in supporting cutting-edge features.
  • Complex Codebase
    WebKit's large and complex codebase can make it difficult for new developers to understand and contribute to the project.
  • Dependency on Apple
    Since WebKit is heavily supported by Apple, changes and development priorities can be influenced by larger strategic objectives of the company.

WebKitGTK+ features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

WebKit videos

Commute talk: How I became a WebKit reviewer

More videos:

  • Review - Rendering in WebKit
  • Review - Kindle 3 WebKit Web Browser Review

WebKitGTK+ videos

No WebKitGTK+ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WebKit and WebKitGTK+)
SEO
100 100%
0% 0
Web Browsers
76 76%
24% 24
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using WebKit and WebKitGTK+. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WebKit should be more popular than WebKitGTK+. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WebKit mentions (29)

  • A Comprehensive Guide to Modern JavaScript Package Managers: npm, pnpm, Yarn, and Bun
    2022: Bun was introduced by Jarred Sumner. It quickly gained attention for its performance, leveraging the JavaScriptCore engine from WebKit. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Opera Vtuber
    WebKit is a browser engine, a part of the software which, under the hood, makes an internet browser function. Apple's Safari browser uses WebKit directly, and then there's the Chromium-based browser family, which uses a previously forked version of WebKit; so browsers based on Chromium, such as Chrome and Edge, use something which was once WebKit, but has had years of development making it different in some ways. Source: over 1 year ago
  • C++ Specification vs Implementation
    Exactly the same as JavaScript engines. Be it Mozilla's SpiderMoneky, Google's V8, Apple's Webkit, or Microsoft's Chakra. No matter how specific we draft a specification there is always room for interpretation. Every team has a different take on what part of a spec is describing. Oftentimes it's just a matter of varying pros and cons of different approaches on the road to matching spec; various teams just kind of... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Why gnome “Web” Browser show as Safari on WhatsApp Web?
    Because both Safari and Gnome Web uses WebKit, but if you are a website on internet and have to guess who is using WebKit, what browser will you guess, Safari or Gnome Web? Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
    Well, the rendering engine is open source. https://webkit.org. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

WebKitGTK+ mentions (5)

  • Trust in Firefox and Mozilla Is Gone – Let's Talk Alternatives
    > Is it something a small team could conceivably do if you placed reasonable constraints on it: one platform at first, no cloud sync, minimal feature set, etc.? Yes. There's a `webkitdev` Docker image which includes the required software to build WebKit on Windows¹, and you can use Playwright to run WebKit (including Web Inspector) on Windows very easily². If you wanted to start with Linux, WebKitGTK would... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Developing a Desktop Application via Rust and NextJS. The Tauri Way.
    One small note regarding Native Webview meant above. You can find ultimate information on this topic here. In a nutshell, Tauri applications use as HTML renderer Webkit (safari engine) on MacOS, Microsoft Edge WebView2 on Windows, and WebKitGTK on Linux (port of Webkit for Linux). Pay attention to the fact that a Tauri application could behave differently on different platforms according to the information above. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Fix Apple Bugs using a "Secret" Linux Browser
    Web (WebKitGTK) there is an alternative webkit browser that shares a lot of bugs, shortcomings, and peculiarities with Apple Safari. Simply called "Web" on my Ubuntu laptop, that "A simple, clean, beautiful view of the web. Powered by WebKitGTK 2.38.5" has also been known as Gnome Web or Epiphany in alternative builds and former version. It's got a beautiful minimalist globe icon, and it can save you time and... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Tauri reached 1.0
    So the Tauri website links to webkitgtk.org which at least is getting regularly updated, though I don't know just how closely it tracks upstream WebKit. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • WebKit: [WPE][GTK] Enable AVIF decoder as experimental feature and unskip tests
    Also please note that this patch is only for the WPE and GTK ports, not yet for Safari. But having it included by default in those could convince Apple to also flip the switch. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WebKit and WebKitGTK+, you can also consider the following products

Blink Rendering Engine - Blink is the rendering engine used by Chromium / Chrome / Edge

Servo - PHP builder application which uses a combination of a powerful editor and drag & drop to make...

Otter Browser - Web browser controlled by the user, not vice-versa.

Can I use - Compatibility tables for support of HTML5, CSS3, SVG and more in desktop and mobile browsers.

Yext - Yext provides your business with the tools you need to engage with customers and gives you more control over how your branding is presented throughout the various platforms that make up the online marketplace.

Ant Design - An enterprise-class UI design language and React implementation with a set of high-quality React components, one of best React UI library for enterprises