Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Webiny VS memcached

Compare Webiny VS memcached and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Webiny logo Webiny

The Enterprise CMS platform that you can host on your cloud

memcached logo memcached

High-performance, distributed memory object caching system
  • Webiny Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-21

Open-source serverless enterprise CMS platform. Includes a headless CMS, page builder, form builder, and file manager. Easy to customize and expand. Deploys to AWS.

  • memcached Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23

Webiny

Website
webiny.com
$ Details
freemium
Platforms
Web REST API Cloud Amazon GraphQL API JavaScript TypeScript Node JS ReactJS AWS
Release Date
2018 June
Startup details
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
Employees
1 - 9

memcached

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Webiny features and specs

  • Advanced Publishing Workflow
  • headless cms
  • Page Builder
  • Form builder
  • File manager
  • Multi-tenant
  • OKTA integration
  • Advanced roles and permissions

memcached features and specs

  • High Performance
    Memcached is incredibly fast and efficient at caching data in memory, enabling quick data retrieval and reducing the load on databases. Its in-memory nature significantly reduces latency.
  • Scalability
    Memcached can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the caching cluster. This allows it to handle increased loads and large datasets without performance degradation.
  • Simplicity
    Memcached has a simple design and API, making it easy to implement and use. Developers can quickly integrate it into their applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Open Source
    Memcached is free and open-source software, which means it can be used and modified without any licensing fees. This makes it a cost-effective solution for caching.
  • Language Agnostic
    Memcached supports multiple programming languages through various client libraries, making it versatile and suitable for use in diverse tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of memcached

  • Data Volatility
    Memcached stores data in RAM, so all cached data is lost if the server is restarted or crashes. This makes it unsuitable for storing critical or persistent data.
  • Limited Data Types
    Memcached primarily supports simple key-value pairs. It lacks the rich data types and more complex structures supported by some other caching solutions like Redis.
  • No Persistence
    Memcached does not offer any data persistence features. It cannot save data to disk, so all information is ephemeral and will be lost on system reset.
  • Size Limitation
    Memcached has a memory limit for each instance, thus, large-scale applications may need to manage multiple instances and ensure data is properly distributed.
  • Security
    Memcached does not provide built-in security features such as authentication or encryption. This can be a concern in environments where data privacy and security are critical.

Analysis of Webiny

Overall verdict

  • Webiny is a solid choice for organizations and developers looking to leverage serverless technology for their web projects. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for developing and managing modern web applications efficiently.

Why this product is good

  • Webiny is considered a good option for those looking to build serverless applications and websites. It is built on top of the Jamstack architecture and offers features like a headless CMS, page builder, form builder, and file manager. The platform's serverless nature allows for scalability, cost-efficiency, and ease of maintenance. Additionally, it is open-source, which means a supportive community and potential for customization.

Recommended for

  • Developers seeking a serverless platform for web development
  • Businesses looking for an open-source headless CMS
  • Projects that need scalable and cost-effective infrastructure
  • Teams that want a robust solution for building dynamic websites and applications

Analysis of memcached

Overall verdict

  • Memcached is a solid choice for applications that require distributed caching to improve scalability and performance. It's particularly beneficial for web applications handling high traffic and needing fast, efficient data retrieval.

Why this product is good

  • Memcached is considered good due to its high performance, simplicity, and effectiveness in enhancing the speed of dynamic web applications by alleviating database load. It operates by storing data in memory, which allows for quick retrieval of cached objects and reduces the need to frequently query the database. Its distributed architecture, open-source nature, and widespread language support make it a flexible and reliable choice for caching.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking to improve the speed and scalability of applications.
  • Organizations needing a simple and effective caching solution to reduce database load.
  • Projects that demand quick deployment of a caching solution with support across multiple programming languages.

Webiny videos

How To Write Content and Create Models

More videos:

  • Demo - How to Create New Fields for the Headless CMS
  • Review - Webiny - Serverless CMS
  • Review - Join The Serverless CMS Revolution For Your Next Website With Webiny (Onboarding and Review)

memcached videos

Course Preview: Using Memcached and Varnish to Speed Up Your Linux Web App

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Webiny and memcached)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
CMS
100 100%
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Webiny and memcached. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Webiny and memcached

Webiny Reviews

We have no reviews of Webiny yet.
Be the first one to post

memcached Reviews

Redis vs. KeyDB vs. Dragonfly vs. Skytable | Hacker News
Quick ask: I don’t see “some” of the other offering out there like MemCached… what was the criteria used to select these? I don’t see any source of how the test where run, specs of the systems, how the DB where set up, etc. Would be very valuable to have in order to attempt to re-validate these test on our own platform. I also came back and saw some of your updates...
Memcached vs Redis - More Different Than You Would Expect
So knowing how the difference between Redis and memcached in-memory usage, lets see what this means. Memcached slabs once assigned never change their size. This means it is possible to poison your memcached cluster and really waste memory. If you load your empty memcached cluster with lots of 1 MB items, then all of the slabs will be allocated to that size. Adding a 80 KB...
Redis vs. Memcached: In-Memory Data Storage Systems
Memcached itself does not support distributed mode. You can only achieve the distributed storage of Memcached on the client side through distributed algorithms such as Consistent Hash. The figure below demonstrates the distributed storage implementation schema of Memcached. Before the client side sends data to the Memcached cluster, it first calculates the target node of the...
Source: medium.com
Why Redis beats Memcached for caching
Both Memcached and Redis are mature and hugely popular open source projects. Memcached was originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick in 2003 for the LiveJournal website. Since then, Memcached has been rewritten in C (the original implementation was in Perl) and put in the public domain, where it has become a cornerstone of modern Web applications. Current development of...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, memcached should be more popular than Webiny. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Webiny mentions (4)

  • Struggling to find the right CMS choice for an ecommerce project
    Even Strapi needs to be hosted somewhere, and that usually involves a recurring fee. I've had great success over the past 2 years building blogs using http://webiny.com, and because they get low traffic, I've only ever had 1 bill from AWS that was around 80 cents US. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • I am looking for a (open-source) headless cms to use for small to medium client projects.
    Strapi is awesome, I've been a fan of the project since its early days. However, I've been closely watching Webiny too. It's easier to host because you don't have to worry about running Docker containers or installing MongoDB on your local machine. Instead you put it on your AWS account (can be done with a few clicks), define your content models once it's there and you then only pay for usage. http://webiny.com. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What’s your top CMS choice?
    Yeah I hear you, SAAS CMS platforms can get prohibitively expensive really quickly after the initial free tier expires. I've found hosting Strapi (or similar) on Heroku has saved me the cost of keeping a server instance running, which usually would cost $5-10 per month. However, the most cost effective for me so far has been Webiny. It's serverless so you install it on AWS and typically don't pay as much (if... Source: about 3 years ago
  • What should I use to build my new project?
    Otherwise if you want a framework to build on, there's Redwood (which works particularly well on Netlify and Vercel) or Webiny (for AWS, Azure and others). - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

memcached mentions (36)

  • MySQL Performance Tuning Techniques
    Memcached can help when lightning-fast performance is needed. These tools store frequently accessed data, such as session details, API responses, or product prices, in RAM. This reduces the laid on your primary database, so you can deliver microsecond response times. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • 10 Best Practices for API Rate Limiting in 2025
    In-memory tools like Redis or Memcached for fast Data retrieval. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: Handling increased user concurrency
    A caching layer using popular in-memory databases like Redis or Memcached can go a long way in addressing Postgres connection overload issues by being able to handle a much larger concurrent request load. Adding a cache lets you serve frequent reads from memory instead, taking pressure off Postgres. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Memcached — Free and well-known for its simplicity, Memcached is a distributed and powerful memory object caching system. It uses key-value pairs to store small data chunks from database calls, API calls, and page rendering. It is available on Windows. Strings are the only supported data type. Its client-server architecture distributes the cache logic, with half of the logic implemented on the server and the other... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • story of upgrading rails 5.x to 7.x
    The app depends on several packages to run, so I need to install them locally too. I used a combination of brew and orbstack / docker for installing packages. Some dependencies for this project are redis, mongodb and memcache. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Webiny and memcached, you can also consider the following products

Ionic Creator V2 - Build better mobile apps, faster

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Serverless - Toolkit for building serverless applications

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Payload CMS - Headless CMS and Application Framework built with Node.js, React and MongoDB

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.