Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Webhook Wizard VS Apache Traffic Server

Compare Webhook Wizard VS Apache Traffic Server and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Webhook Wizard logo Webhook Wizard

Quickly build and manage Webhooks Webhook delivery with flexibility, reliability, monitoring and debugging.

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.
  • Webhook Wizard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-08

Delivering webhooks is more than just sending one request. Webhooks wizard helps you manage your webhooks through the entire lifecycle, from delivering, monitoring, disaster recovery and support.

  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Webhook Wizard features and specs

  • User-Friendliness
    Webhook Wizard offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the process of setting up and managing webhooks, making it accessible even to users without extensive technical experience.
  • Automation
    The platform allows for automated processes that can save time and reduce human error by ensuring real-time data transfer between applications.
  • Customization
    Users can customize webhook events to meet specific workflow requirements, allowing for a tailored experience that fits diverse business needs.
  • Integration Support
    Webhook Wizard provides support for integrating multiple services and applications, enhancing its utility for users who need various software solutions to communicate with each other.

Possible disadvantages of Webhook Wizard

  • Learning Curve
    Despite being user-friendly, users new to webhooks may still face a learning curve when initially setting up more complex or customized integrations.
  • Limited Free Features
    While there might be a free tier available, more advanced features are likely gated behind a paywall, limiting access for users not willing to pay for the service.
  • Reliability Concerns
    As with any web-based service, there might be occasional reliability issues or downtime that could impact the real-time nature of webhook-based notifications.
  • Security Risks
    Handling webhooks involves potential security risks, such as unauthorized access or data breaches, particularly if the service doesn’t offer robust security features.

Apache Traffic Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Traffic Server

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.

Webhook Wizard videos

No Webhook Wizard videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Apache Traffic Server videos

+ Add

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Webhook Wizard and Apache Traffic Server)

Webhook Wizard

Apache Traffic Server

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Proxy Server
0 0%
Proxy Server
100% 100
APIs
100 100%
APIs
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
Proxy
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Webhook Wizard and Apache Traffic Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Traffic Server should be more popular than Webhook Wizard. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Webhook Wizard mentions (3)

  • Debugging webhook's used to take hours, now with Webhook Wizard it takes minutes.
    As a developer I've seen a lot of webhooks, we use them every day. And I've seen all the ways they can go wrong. Sometimes the data is in the wrong format, other times theres a retry leading to bad behaviour, or it could just not be getting sent. Previously, I would be be scratching my head, cobbling together logging, re-deploying, waiting for it to happen again. Now with WebhookWizard, I can see whats... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is there some alternative to Make(integromat) and Zapier?
    Theres webhookwizard.com its very focused on webhooks though, unlike Zap and Make, which could be a good thing depending on your use case. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Git hub webhook
    It might help to put a webhook logging router in the middle like webhookwizard.com so you can see the response. Source: over 2 years ago

Apache Traffic Server mentions (6)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server — A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides authentication and basic authorization through plugins. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Webhook Wizard and Apache Traffic Server, you can also consider the following products

Svix - The enterprise ready webhooks service, open-source and in the cloud.

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

Webhook.site - Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.

3proxy - 3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

Webhooks by Zapier - Move Your Data Instantly With Webhooks

CCProxy - Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?

Loading...