Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Webhook.site VS Graphical HTTP Client

Compare Webhook.site VS Graphical HTTP Client and see what are their differences

Webhook.site logo Webhook.site

Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.

Graphical HTTP Client logo Graphical HTTP Client

Graphical Http Client is a utility to help you test and interact with REST-based web services.
  • Webhook.site Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-30

With Webhook.site, you instantly get a unique, random URL and e-mail address that you can use to test and debug Webhooks, HTTP requests and emails, as well as to create your own workflows using the Custom Actions graphical editor or WebhookScript–a simple scripting language, to transform, validate and process HTTP requests.

What are people using it for?

  • Receive Webhooks without needing an internet-facing Web server
  • Send Webhooks to a server that's behind a firewall or private subnet
  • Transforming Webhooks into other formats, and re-sending them to different systems
  • Connect different APIs that aren't compatible
  • Building contact forms that send emails
  • Instantly build APIs without needing infrastructure

Native integrations include:

  • Google Sheets
  • Dropbox
  • Discord
  • Slack
  • AWS S3 and CloudFront
  • SSH
  • FTP(S)
  • Graphical HTTP Client Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-07

Webhook.site

$ Details
freemium $14.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Browser REST API Cross Platform Python Windows Mac OSX Linux Command Line Interface
Release Date
2016 March

Graphical HTTP Client

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Webhook.site features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Webhook.site provides an extremely user-friendly interface, allowing users to easily create and manage webhook URLs without any technical overhead.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It allows users to monitor incoming HTTP requests in real time, facilitating quick debugging and validation of webhooks.
  • Customization
    Users can customize webhook responses and request headers, making it versatile for various testing scenarios.
  • Temporarily Generated URLs
    Webhook.site generates unique, temporary URLs for testing, which is useful for preventing conflicts and collisions in a multi-user environment.
  • Persistence
    Webhook.site retains the payload data for a certain period, allowing users to review past submissions and data history.
  • Free Tier
    It offers a free tier that is sufficient for basic usage and testing, making it accessible for individual developers and small projects.

Possible disadvantages of Webhook.site

  • Limited Free Features
    The free tier has limitations, such as a cap on the number of requests and retention period, which may not be sufficient for large-scale or extended testing.
  • Data Retention Limits
    Payload data and request logs are stored for a limited time, which might be inconvenient for long-term projects that require persistent data.
  • Security
    While temporary URLs enhance security, there is still some risk involved in exposing potentially sensitive webhook data to a third-party service.
  • Integration Complexity
    Integrating Webhook.site with certain complex systems may require additional setup and configuration, potentially increasing the initial workload.
  • Feature Limitations
    Advanced features and higher limits are part of the paid plan, which might not be ideal for budget-constrained projects.

Graphical HTTP Client features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The Graphical HTTP Client offers a graphical interface that is intuitive for users, making it straightforward to visualize and construct HTTP requests without needing deep coding expertise.
  • Ease of Use
    Designed to simplify the process of making HTTP requests, it provides users with an accessible way to interact with web services and APIs.
  • Visualization
    Offers visual tools for monitoring and analyzing request/response cycles, making it easier to debug and understand API interactions.
  • Rapid Testing
    Allows users to quickly test API endpoints and integrations, saving time compared to traditional methods that might require manual scripting.

Possible disadvantages of Graphical HTTP Client

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Might lack some of the advanced features and flexibility of command-line or script-based HTTP clients, which could be necessary for complex tasks.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Users new to the concept of HTTP clients might still face a learning curve in understanding how to properly construct and utilize HTTP requests effectively.
  • Dependency on GUI
    Being a graphical tool, it may not offer the same level of automation and scripting capabilities as CLI-based tools, limiting its use in automated workflows.
  • Resource Intensity
    Graphical applications can consume more system resources compared to text-based alternatives, potentially making them less suitable for resource-constrained environments.

Webhook.site videos

Webhook.site Custom Actions Demo

Graphical HTTP Client videos

No Graphical HTTP Client videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Webhook.site and Graphical HTTP Client)
Developer Tools
91 91%
9% 9
APIs
87 87%
13% 13
API Tools
85 85%
15% 15
Webhooks
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Webhook.site and Graphical HTTP Client. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webhook.site seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 77 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Webhook.site mentions (77)

  • Solving The Big IAM Challenge
    Okay, let’s think. Since we don’t have access to email, we need to figure out another way to receive a message from the topic. How can we do that? What are the options to receive messages from SNS? We can use the following protocols to communicate with SNS: HTTP, HTTPS, email, email-json, SMS, SQS, application, Lambda, and Firehose. What if we set up an HTTP endpoint to receive messages? Webhooks, here we go!... - Source: dev.to / about 9 hours ago
  • Authorization in MCP Server with Permit.io - A JIRA-like Task Management API
    The session token will be sent to a webhook, you can use services such as Webhook.site to receive the session code. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
  • Midjourney Imagine API Application and Usage
    ## Asynchronous Callback Since generating images with Midjourney requires a waiting period, this API is also designed by default for long wait mode. However, in certain scenarios, long waits may incur additional resource overhead, so this API also provides an asynchronous Webhook callback method. When the image generation is successful or fails, the result will be sent to the specified Webhook callback URL via an... - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago
  • Part 1: Master Authentication and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) with Kinde and Convex in a File-Sharing Application
    You can also use tools like webhook.site to test your webhook and see the type of payload it sends. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Exploring Async Deepgram API: Speech-to-Text using Python
    You can use for sample call back URL for testing. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

Graphical HTTP Client mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Graphical HTTP Client yet. Tracking of Graphical HTTP Client recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Webhook.site and Graphical HTTP Client, you can also consider the following products

MockServer - Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

Hurl.it - Hurl makes HTTP requests.

Request inspector - Debug web hooks, http clients

RESTClient - RESTClient can be used to test variety of HTTP communications and RESTful webservices.