Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Webapp Manager VS NW.js

Compare Webapp Manager VS NW.js and see what are their differences

Webapp Manager logo Webapp Manager

Run websites as if they were apps

NW.js logo NW.js

nwjs
  • Webapp Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-13
  • NW.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

Webapp Manager features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Webapp Manager provides a simple interface to convert web apps into desktop applications, making it user-friendly even for those with limited technical knowledge.
  • Integration
    Allows web apps to integrate more seamlessly into the desktop environment, providing features like windowed mode and launching directly from the main application menu.
  • Organization
    Enables better organization of web applications, separating them from typical browser tabs and giving each a designated space.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Running web apps in isolation can be more resource-efficient compared to having multiple tabs open in a full browser, potentially reducing system load.

Possible disadvantages of Webapp Manager

  • Limited Functionality
    Some complex web applications may not perform as well or have limited functionality when run through a web application manager compared to a full-featured browser.
  • Dependency on AUR
    Since this package is available via AUR, users must manage potential risks associated with using unofficial or community-maintained repositories.
  • Feature Parity
    Not all features available in modern browsers (such as extensions or developer tools) may be accessible within the Webapp Manager environment.
  • Potential for Bugs
    As with any third-party tool, there could be bugs or stability issues, especially with updates or changes to web technologies or desktop environments.

NW.js features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    NW.js supports building applications that run on Windows, macOS, and Linux, enabling developers to write code once and deploy across multiple platforms.
  • Node.js Integration
    Provides deep integration with Node.js, allowing developers to leverage the vast Node.js ecosystem and modules within their applications.
  • Chromium Embedded
    Utilizes the Chromium engine to render the user interface, ensuring modern web standards compliance and high performance.
  • Full Access to Native APIs
    Offers access to all native system calls through Node.js, enabling developers to create rich desktop applications with full OS-level capabilities.
  • Single Process Model
    Allows developers to start with a simple single process model which is easy to debug and manage.

Possible disadvantages of NW.js

  • Large Application Size
    The bundling of Chromium with the application often results in larger file sizes compared to native applications.
  • Memory Consumption
    Applications may use more memory as they run instances of both Node.js and Chromium, potentially taxing system resources.
  • Performance Overhead
    There might be additional performance overhead compared to native applications due to the abstraction layers of Node.js and Chromium.
  • Limited Native UI Components
    Relies on web technologies for UI, which might not have the same look and feel as platform-native components.
  • Frequent Updates
    Keeping up with frequent updates from Chromium and Node.js can be challenging, requiring continuous maintenance to ensure compatibility and security.

Webapp Manager videos

No Webapp Manager videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

NW.js videos

NW.js vs Electron. Что выбрать для работы NW или Electron? JavaScript Desktop

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Webapp Manager and NW.js)
Development Tools
25 25%
75% 75
Group Chat & Notifications
Rapid Application Development
Mac
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Webapp Manager and NW.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Webapp Manager and NW.js

Webapp Manager Reviews

We have no reviews of Webapp Manager yet.
Be the first one to post

NW.js Reviews

Electron Alternatives﹣5 Best JavaScript Frameworks for Desktop Apps
Although it’s the oldest Node.js-Chromium framework in the AppJS, Electron and NW.js trio, it’s not nearly as mature as its competition. Because it has lost its momentum, it may not be the best choice for new projects.
Source: brainhub.eu
Frameworks & Tools to Develop Cross-Platform Desktop Apps – Best of
Cons: Some hard work features that are available in Electron, such as auto-updater and crash-reporting, don’t comes built-in with NW.js. That said, building with NW.js requires more efforts and extra modules – unlike other solutions.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NW.js seems to be a lot more popular than Webapp Manager. While we know about 33 links to NW.js, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Webapp Manager. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Webapp Manager mentions (3)

  • Native PWA Support
    I just install Linux Mint's WebApp Manager. Its a simple python program that does what you're looking for and its in the AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/webapp-manager. Source: about 3 years ago
  • whatsaap-web-desktop
    If you only use firefox you can install this (yay -S webapp-manager) web app manager that can create a web app for any site with firefox. Since whatsapp is a simple app you should be good. Source: about 3 years ago
  • How can I split Discord into two processes in the panel?
    Here's another alternative: use the webapp client for discord. I use webapp-manager for many web apps. You could create multiple webapps running different discord accounts. Source: over 3 years ago

NW.js mentions (33)

  • Linux 6.9 Set to Drop the Old NTFS File-System Driver
    > FUSE drivers are slow, but "wildly slow" is an overstatement. I can confirm this, I've played RPGMaker M{V,Z} games natively by swapping out the copy of NWJS¹ it shipped with and running it through a CIOPFS² mount. 1: https://nwjs.io/ 2: https://www.brain-dump.org/projects/ciopfs/ / https://github.com/martanne/ciopfs. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • How to play this on a Chromebook through Linux Itch.io
    Go to this page to download NW.js https://nwjs.io/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What would be the current recommended way to publishing an html5 game on steam?
    In addition to the other options here you could look at nw.js. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Console Commands, Kill Count And Saving System
    I don't think you can access it by default, but crosscode runs on [nw.js](https://nwjs.io). I know there is a way to get the chromium devtools to open, but I haven't been able to. Source: about 2 years ago
  • DuckieTV not launching
    Or browse the NWJS home page at https://nwjs.io/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Webapp Manager and NW.js, you can also consider the following products

Native Alpha - Native Alpha lets you create full screen Web Apps with shortcuts and custom settings.

Electron - Build cross platform desktop apps with web technologies

Fluid - Turn Your Favorite Web Apps into Real Mac Apps.

NeutralinoJS - Neutralino is a lightweight application development framework.

WebCatalog - Run your favorite web apps natively

Proton Native - A React environment for cross platform native desktop app