Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Web.dev by Google VS Mailosaur

Compare Web.dev by Google VS Mailosaur and see what are their differences

Web.dev by Google logo Web.dev by Google

Learn how to build for the web and see where you stand 🌟

Mailosaur logo Mailosaur

Email Testing for QA & Development Teams.
  • Web.dev by Google Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-20
  • Mailosaur Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Web.dev by Google and Mailosaur)
Online Services
100 100%
0% 0
Email
0 0%
100% 100
SEO Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Email Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Web.dev by Google and Mailosaur. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Web.dev by Google seems to be a lot more popular than Mailosaur. While we know about 126 links to Web.dev by Google, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Mailosaur. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Web.dev by Google mentions (126)

  • Old Dogs, New CSS Tricks
    It may be ran by Google, but https://web.dev/ is one good source for keeping up with new web technologies. - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago
  • Lessons from open-source: Use window.trustedTypes to prevent DOM XSS.
    “If the sanitization logic in DOMPurify is buggy, your application might still have a DOM XSS vulnerability. Trusted Types force you to process a value somehow, but don’t yet define what the exact processing rules are, and whether they are safe.” — this caution from web.dev makes me want to play around with TrustedTypes more and get a better understanding. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Building a realtime chat app with Next.js and Vercel
    Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Navigating the Waters of Core Web Vitals in 2024
    The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • How hard has code splitting been in your experience?
    Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css. Source: 6 months ago
View more

Mailosaur mentions (4)

  • Effective Test Strategies for Testing Front-end Applications using LaunchDarkly Feature Flags and Cypress. Part2: testing
    The proper solution to tests sharing state would be randomization. Unless we are locked to real hardware - even then there is virtualization - we can randomize anything. We saw an example of this in the blog post about email testing , under the section Achieving Stateless tests with unique emails. With mailosaur any-name@unique-serverId.mailosaur.io went to that unique email server inbox, and we differentiated... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Test emails effortlessly with Cypress, Mailosaur and cy-spok
    There are plenty of email testing solutions available, and combinations of test frameworks that integrate with them. For the code snippets and working examples, we will be using Cypress and Mailosaur, but the ideas should generally apply to any tuple of email services and test automation frameworks. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Twilio blocked our account and with it hundreds of our customers
    Somewhat related anecdote. Whilst we didn't get cut off, we found a huge drop-off in time to receive, and the quality of, support from our live chat/support messaging provider. Having been a customer since our launch [1], and very early after theirs, it has been really sad and frustrating to see that friendly distrupter energy zap out of the service. I get why businesses go through that changes like this during... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Can you recommend an automation tool or library for testing received emails?
    We have enjoyed using mailosaur. Also makes it easy to see cc, bccs, etc at a glance. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Web.dev by Google and Mailosaur, you can also consider the following products

cutestat - Website Stats and Valuation. CuteStat.

Mailtrap - Email Delivery Platform that delivers just in time.
 Great for businesses and individuals.

Rankchart - Rankchart is one of the unique websites that allows you to examine your websites or watch competitors and locate rich information about website technologies, site reputation, errors, SEO, and ad-word recommendations.

MailHog - MailHog is an email testing tool inspired by MailCatcher, but easier to install.

Site Worth traffic - Site Worth traffic is a cost-effective site that is introduced to estimate the value, daily page views, daily visitors, and daily revenue of a website.

FakeSMTP - FakeSMTP is a Free Fake SMTP Server with GUI for testing emails in applications easily.