Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Web.dev by Google VS FakeSMTP

Compare Web.dev by Google VS FakeSMTP and see what are their differences

Web.dev by Google logo Web.dev by Google

Learn how to build for the web and see where you stand 🌟

FakeSMTP logo FakeSMTP

FakeSMTP is a Free Fake SMTP Server with GUI for testing emails in applications easily.
  • Web.dev by Google Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-20
  • FakeSMTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Web.dev by Google and FakeSMTP)
Online Services
100 100%
0% 0
Email
0 0%
100% 100
SEO Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Email Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Web.dev by Google and FakeSMTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Web.dev by Google seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 126 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Web.dev by Google mentions (126)

  • Old Dogs, New CSS Tricks
    It may be ran by Google, but https://web.dev/ is one good source for keeping up with new web technologies. - Source: Hacker News / 22 days ago
  • Lessons from open-source: Use window.trustedTypes to prevent DOM XSS.
    “If the sanitization logic in DOMPurify is buggy, your application might still have a DOM XSS vulnerability. Trusted Types force you to process a value somehow, but don’t yet define what the exact processing rules are, and whether they are safe.” — this caution from web.dev makes me want to play around with TrustedTypes more and get a better understanding. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Building a realtime chat app with Next.js and Vercel
    Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Navigating the Waters of Core Web Vitals in 2024
    The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • How hard has code splitting been in your experience?
    Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css. Source: 6 months ago
View more

FakeSMTP mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of FakeSMTP yet. Tracking of FakeSMTP recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Web.dev by Google and FakeSMTP, you can also consider the following products

cutestat - Website Stats and Valuation. CuteStat.

MailHog - MailHog is an email testing tool inspired by MailCatcher, but easier to install.

Rankchart - Rankchart is one of the unique websites that allows you to examine your websites or watch competitors and locate rich information about website technologies, site reputation, errors, SEO, and ad-word recommendations.

Mailtrap - Email Delivery Platform that delivers just in time.
 Great for businesses and individuals.

WebsiteOutlook - WebsiteOutlook is an all-in-one website that provides you detailed information on famous websites based on various data sources like traffic, page rank, and estimated ad revenue.

MailCatcher - MailCatcher runs a super simple SMTP server which catches any message sent to it to display in a...