Web.com VS Sitecake

Web.com Reviews

Sitecake Reviews

Web.com mentions (46)

• New site redirect

  Hi all, I'm building a new site via Google Sites to replace my pre-existing web.com site. I would like the URL to remain the same. What do I need to do to redirect to the new Google Site once finished? Thanks in advance! Source: 5 months ago

• Just bought a domain name, how do I connect it to my html code?

  I'm not sure how to connect the html code to the domain name? I don't see an interface from web.com (purchasing site) other than their expensive website building packages. I don't want to pay that amount for developing the website as the point is to code the entire thing by hand. Source: 8 months ago

• Worst revival to make with?

  Web (yes I'm not kidding its web.com). Source: 9 months ago

• Google Domains is going away, now owned by SquareSpace. Well that sucks.

  A good analogy is to look at Network Solutions. It's a horrible company that is owned by web.com. Web.com only cares about sales and marketing. The registrar aspects just a path to cross-sell you on bullshit services. Source: 11 months ago

• Google domains closing, selling all assets and domains to Squarespace!

  This sucks. What I liked about Google Domains is that price remained the same year after year. Most registers are owned by a couple companies (web.com or something?) and every renewal it is some jacked up artificial price. $12 for the first year and somehow it is $36+ for the next? All the registers should be price regulated. Source: 11 months ago

Sitecake mentions (5)

• Maintaining this site fucking sucks

  Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS

  I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?

  Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago

• Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?

  May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

• Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?

  Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago