Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage VS sshfs

Compare Wasabi Cloud Object Storage VS sshfs and see what are their differences

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage logo Wasabi Cloud Object Storage

Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

sshfs logo sshfs

This is a filesystem client based on the SSH File Transfer Protocol.
  • Wasabi Cloud Object Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-04-16

Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is a scalable, cloud-based object storage service for various applications. It allows storing any type of data in any format, offering high-performance, reliability, and security at a minimal cost. Ideal for individuals and organizations seeking affordable, dependable data storage, Wasabi provides a highly durable and fault-tolerant infrastructure, ensuring data is always accessible and protected. With features like immutable buckets, versioning, and encryption, Wasabi ensures data integrity and security, making it a trusted choice for businesses and individuals alike.

  • sshfs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage

Website
wasabi.com
Release Date
2015 January
Startup details
Country
United States
City
Boston
Founder(s)
David Friend
Employees
100 - 249

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage features and specs

  • Cost-Effective
    Wasabi offers competitive pricing for cloud storage without any hidden fees, making it a cost-effective option for businesses of all sizes.
  • High Performance
    Wasabi provides high-speed data retrieval and upload, which is ideal for applications requiring fast access to stored data.
  • Simple Pricing Model
    There are no fees for egress or API requests, which simplifies budgeting and cost management.
  • Scalability
    Wasabi's storage solutions can scale to meet the needs of growing businesses, providing flexibility as data storage requirements increase.
  • Security
    Wasabi offers strong security features, including data encryption both in transit and at rest, ensuring the safety of stored data.
  • S3 Compatibility
    Wasabi's storage service is compatible with the Amazon S3 API, making it easier for users to integrate with existing tools and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Wasabi Cloud Object Storage

  • Limited Services
    Compared to larger cloud providers like AWS or Google Cloud, Wasabi focuses primarily on storage and offers fewer ancillary services and features.
  • Geographical Availability
    Wasabi has fewer data center locations worldwide compared to major competitors, which might impact performance for users in certain regions.
  • Customer Support
    While Wasabi offers customer support, it may not be as comprehensive or as responsive as the support provided by larger cloud service providers.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    Although it supports S3 compatibility, Wasabi might not integrate as seamlessly with other cloud ecosystem services beyond storage.
  • No Free Tier
    Unlike some competitors, Wasabi does not offer a free tier for basic storage needs, which could be a drawback for small businesses or startups.

sshfs features and specs

  • Remote File Access
    SSHFS allows you to mount remote directories over SSH, enabling seamless access to files on a remote server as if they were on your local machine.
  • Security
    Relying on SSH for data transmission ensures encrypted and secure communication between the client and server, protecting against eavesdropping and tampering.
  • Ease of Use
    Setting up SSHFS is straightforward for those already familiar with SSH, making it a convenient solution for remote file handling without needing additional configurations.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    SSHFS can be used across various Unix-like systems and has ports for macOS and Windows, offering broad compatibility for different environments.
  • Portability
    As SSHFS builds on SSH, it can be used almost anywhere SSH is available, providing flexibility in working across different networks and setups.

Possible disadvantages of sshfs

  • Performance
    Since SSHFS relies on SSH for data transfer, it may not perform as well as traditional network file systems, particularly over high-latency connections.
  • Limited Functionality
    SSHFS might not support all functionalities of a full-fledged network file system, such as advanced file locking mechanisms or sophisticated permission management.
  • Dependency on SSH
    The effectiveness of SSHFS is contingent upon SSH configurations and permissions, which can limit usability if not properly set up.
  • Potential Security Risks
    If SSH access is compromised or not sufficiently secured, the data accessed over SSHFS is at risk, underscoring the need for robust SSH security practices.
  • Mount Stability
    In the event of network interruptions or SSH session drops, SSHFS mounts can become unstable or unresponsive, requiring remounting or manual intervention.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage videos

Introduction to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage (August 2021) | Wasabi

sshfs videos

Mounting Remote Filesystems With SSHFS

More videos:

  • Review - sshfs - Mount Network Share over SSH - Linux CLI
  • Review - Hak5 - Build Secure Online Storage - SSHFS, File Systems, Fuse and Userland, Hak5 1111 part1

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wasabi Cloud Object Storage and sshfs)
Cloud Storage
86 86%
14% 14
FTP Client
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Object Storage
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Wasabi Cloud Object Storage and sshfs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Wasabi Cloud Object Storage and sshfs

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage Reviews

7 Best Amazon S3 Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Wasabi hot storage differentiates itself against industry giants like Amazon S3 by offering storage that’s six times faster and up to 80% cheaper.
Wasabi, Storj, Backblaze et al, are promising 80%+ savings compared to Amazon S3... What's the catch?
On the surface, Wasabi looks appealing with a simple pricing structure ($5.99/TB/mo) that comes with free egress and free operations. How can Wasabi afford this, you ask? Well, their business model relies on their user-base keeping their data stored (and unchanged) for some time and not consuming more than their fair share of resources, which they regulate via a handful of...
Source: dev.to

sshfs Reviews

We have no reviews of sshfs yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wasabi Cloud Object Storage should be more popular than sshfs. It has been mentiond 70 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage mentions (70)

  • Using ColdFusion to Generate Pre-Signed Wasabi Download URL
    There was an internal decision to use Wasabi Cloud Storage instead of Amazon S3 and I needed to use ColdFusion to generate a pre-signed URL to allow access to AI-generated content for a limited time. I had used the Sv4Util.cfc and aws-cfml libraries before with Amazon and thought it was just as simple, but I got confused somewhere along the way and it just wasn't working. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How much 1 TB of egress costs by cloud provider
    This table is missing Wasabi [0], which has free egress. [0]: https://wasabi.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • What makes backblaze better than some of the other options out there?
    Backblaze is great because it's a set price, unlimited, and I don't have to think twice about it. I use Arq to backup my machine + external drives (several drives with lots of photos) to my local NAS. Was sending data to Wasabi, but the costs got out of control. I can purchase a year's worth of Backblaze + the 1 year revision upgrade for much, much less of what I was paying at Wasabi. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • The NixOS Foundation’s Call to Action: S3 Costs Require Community Support
    What about looking at Wasabi? It’s $5.99 per TB per month https://wasabi.com. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • A web application that will need to store lots of image files. The company wants to use Dropbox for image storage. Is this okay?
    No, use AWS S3 or https://wasabi.com/ if you are worried about cost. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

sshfs mentions (34)

  • Sshfs for Windows
    What are you basing that on? It had a release in 2022 and last commit is 7 months old. It probably hasn't needed any new features in a while. I'm not sure how often it would need security updates. Ah, I see now there's a note in the README[0]. It sounds more like it's in maintenance mode / understaffed than completely abandoned, but I suppose it's worth being aware of. Sshfs has been a killer feature for me on my... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • How do you setup your gnome extension development environment?
    Sshfs - allows us mount a remote filesystem using SFTP. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • The Cheapest NAS
    I use sshfs. If you can login via ssh then you can mount the remote server through ssh as a local drive. https://github.com/libfuse/sshfs For added security I limit my home ssh access to a handful of trusted IPs including my cloud VM. Then I set up an ssh tunnel from my hotel through the cloud VM to home. The cloud VM never sees my password / key. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Rclone syncs your files to cloud storage
    > It's replaced sshfs for some cases. I'd been using sshfs for some years until I learned that rclone can mount remotes to the file system, and I've been using that happily since then. https://rclone.org/commands/rclone_mount/ > at present SSHFS does not have any active, regular contributors, and there are a number of known issues - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • A currently maintained fork of SSHFS
    Interesting, I alaways assumed sshfs was part of OpenSSH, learn something new every day. Also, looks like sshfs used in Slackware is abandoned. https://github.com/libfuse/sshfs A quote from the link, I wonder if this project will be the 'one': >If you would like to take over this project, you are welcome to do so. Please fork it and develop the fork for a while. Once... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wasabi Cloud Object Storage and sshfs, you can also consider the following products

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

WinSCP - WinSCP is an open source free SFTP client and FTP client for Windows.

Contabo Object Storage - S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.

Rclone - rsync for cloud storage.

Hetzner Object Storage - Scalable object storage, S3-compatible and ideal for growing data volumes. Secure and flexible for efficient data storage.

RaiDrive - Mount NAS, Router, Google Drive, OneDrive and Dropbox to a network drive or file explorer.