Warp VS Pastel

In addition to ISPC, some of this is also done in software fallback implementations of GPU APIs. In the open source world we have SwiftShader and Lavapipe, and on Windows we have WARP[1]. It's sad to me that Larrabee didn't catch on, as that might have been a path to a good parallel computer, one that has efficient parallel throughput like a GPU, but also agility more like a CPU, so you don't need to batch things... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

If you select a WARP driver it should "theoretically work". But there are some limits with the WARP devices (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/direct3darticles/directx-warp). Source: over 1 year ago

If you use D3D11 or D3D12, those come with a software rasterizer by default so you can do graphics programming even without a GPU. It's called WARP and it's what Windows uses to e.g. Render the desktop and stuff before you install your graphics drivers. Source: almost 2 years ago

Competitors There are a few competitors out there that do something very similar (see https://ruttl.com/, https://usepastel.com/, https://bugherd.com/, https://www.markup.io/). This seems to suggest that there seems to be a general market for such a product. Source: about 1 year ago

Yes, we used Pastel https://usepastel.com and it was very nice overall. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago