Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Wallaby.js VS RunJS

Compare Wallaby.js VS RunJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Wallaby.js logo Wallaby.js

Wallaby.js runs your JavaScript tests immediately as you type and displays execution results in your code editor.

RunJS logo RunJS

A modern JavaScript playground, with Node and browser APIs and support for Babel and TypeScript. Write JavaScript and get instant feedback as you type.
  • Wallaby.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26
  • RunJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-12

Wallaby.js features and specs

  • Fast Feedback
    Wallaby.js provides immediate feedback by running tests as you type, allowing developers to identify and fix issues quickly.
  • Inline Code Coverage
    It displays code coverage information directly in the editor, helping developers see which lines of code are covered by tests and which are not.
  • Productivity Boost
    By automating testing processes and providing real-time results, Wallaby.js enhances productivity, allowing developers to focus more on writing code rather than managing tests.
  • Integration
    Wallaby.js integrates with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, JetBrains IDEs, and more, offering flexibility in various development environments.
  • Advanced Configuration
    The tool provides advanced configuration options, allowing developers to tailor the testing environment to suit their specific project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Wallaby.js

  • Cost
    Wallaby.js is a commercial product with a price tag, which might not be suitable for all developers or projects, especially open-source or hobby projects.
  • Complexity
    With its advanced features and options, there might be a learning curve for some developers, especially those who are new to such tools.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running continuous tests can be resource intensive, potentially slowing down the development environment on less powerful machines.
  • Limited Language Support
    Wallaby.js primarily supports JavaScript, TypeScript, and related frameworks, which may not be suitable for projects using other programming languages.
  • Environment Dependence
    Its full benefits are best experienced with supported IDEs, potentially limiting its utility in environments outside of those IDEs.

RunJS features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Wallaby.js videos

introduction to wallaby.js STEP1(make library as jQuery plugin)

RunJS videos

No RunJS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wallaby.js and RunJS)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript
0 0%
100% 100
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Programming
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Wallaby.js and RunJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wallaby.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wallaby.js mentions (7)

  • Are there any continuous testing tools with real-time line-by-line IDE feedback for Rust?
    Basically I'm looking for https://wallabyjs.com/ for Rust. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Testing in ReScript
    Besides bindings for JavaScript libraries, there is rescript-test - a lightweight test framework written in ReScript for ReScript. I have heard that some people like it, but for me, it lacks coverage output and Wallaby support. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • I'd like to use a REPL in my workflow for getting feedback on my code. Is this a reasonable ask? If not, how do you check your code as you go?
    I’m a Clojure(script) dev learning TS. My Clojure REPL flow is Cursive + IntelliJ. The closest equivalent I’ve found is https://quokkajs.com for inline evaluation and https://wallabyjs.com for test evaluation. Both are paid products but have free 30 day evaluation periods. Both work in IntelliJ and VsCode. Source: over 2 years ago
  • [AskJS] Current Issues with Jest Output and Workflow
    Https://wallabyjs.com/ covers pretty much every testing related needs for me. Source: about 3 years ago
  • jest package with highlighting results in window
    I recently switched from webstorm to emacs ( I'm super noob in emacs and lisp :) ) and one tool which I need was wallaby but unfortunately I didn't find anything like that for emacs. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

RunJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RunJS yet. Tracking of RunJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wallaby.js and RunJS, you can also consider the following products

WompMobile - WompMobile offers tow kind of functions – first creating new mobile apps and secondly converting the websites into mobile applications.

Deno - A secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Oracle Mobile Application - Oracle Mobile Application framework or Oracle Mobile Application development platform is a hybrid mobile framework for rapidly developing single source applications for many platforms and devices.

PLAYCODE.io JavaScript Online Editor - The #1 JavaScript online editor and compiler to write, compile and run JavaScript online. Perfect for learn and prototype javascript. Easy to use.

AppGyver Composer - Visual enterprise-grade low code mobile app builder

Quokka.js - Quokka.js is a rapid prototyping playground for JavaScript and TypeScript. What that means is that it runs your code immediately as you type and displays various execution results in your code editor.