Wallaby.js VS Chai

Basically I'm looking for https://wallabyjs.com/ for Rust. Source: about 1 year ago

Besides bindings for JavaScript libraries, there is rescript-test - a lightweight test framework written in ReScript for ReScript. I have heard that some people like it, but for me, it lacks coverage output and Wallaby support. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I’m a Clojure(script) dev learning TS. My Clojure REPL flow is Cursive + IntelliJ. The closest equivalent I’ve found is https://quokkajs.com for inline evaluation and https://wallabyjs.com for test evaluation. Both are paid products but have free 30 day evaluation periods. Both work in IntelliJ and VsCode. Source: over 1 year ago

Https://wallabyjs.com/ covers pretty much every testing related needs for me. Source: about 2 years ago

I recently switched from webstorm to emacs ( I'm super noob in emacs and lisp :) ) and one tool which I need was wallaby but unfortunately I didn't find anything like that for emacs. Source: about 2 years ago

Mocha as the test runner, Chai as the assertion library, and the Hardhat Chai Matchers to extend Chai with contracts-related functionality. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Assertion library we used: Chai (comes with a lot of plugins worth exploring). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

While this is fine and I could have perfectly moved all my tests to use said assertion style, I like the descriptive way Jest tests look like. As a quick way to maintain certain similarity I reached for ChaiJS, an assertion library that is mainly used with mocha. Chai offers expect like assertions that can arguably be more descriptive than Jest’s. Instead of writing expect(…).toBe(true), you’d write... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

The library offers a BDD testing style and fully exploits javascript promises - the resulting tests are simple, clear and expressive. Chakram is built on node.js, mocha, chai and request. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago