Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Wallaby.js VS Apache Flex

Compare Wallaby.js VS Apache Flex and see what are their differences

Wallaby.js logo Wallaby.js

Wallaby.js runs your JavaScript tests immediately as you type and displays execution results in your code editor.

Apache Flex logo Apache Flex

Apache Flex is an open-source tool that allows users to build their own apps. Applications can be designed and created for a variety of mobile and traditional platforms. Read more about Apache Flex.
  • Wallaby.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26
  • Apache Flex Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-13

Wallaby.js features and specs

  • Fast Feedback
    Wallaby.js provides immediate feedback by running tests as you type, allowing developers to identify and fix issues quickly.
  • Inline Code Coverage
    It displays code coverage information directly in the editor, helping developers see which lines of code are covered by tests and which are not.
  • Productivity Boost
    By automating testing processes and providing real-time results, Wallaby.js enhances productivity, allowing developers to focus more on writing code rather than managing tests.
  • Integration
    Wallaby.js integrates with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, JetBrains IDEs, and more, offering flexibility in various development environments.
  • Advanced Configuration
    The tool provides advanced configuration options, allowing developers to tailor the testing environment to suit their specific project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Wallaby.js

  • Cost
    Wallaby.js is a commercial product with a price tag, which might not be suitable for all developers or projects, especially open-source or hobby projects.
  • Complexity
    With its advanced features and options, there might be a learning curve for some developers, especially those who are new to such tools.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running continuous tests can be resource intensive, potentially slowing down the development environment on less powerful machines.
  • Limited Language Support
    Wallaby.js primarily supports JavaScript, TypeScript, and related frameworks, which may not be suitable for projects using other programming languages.
  • Environment Dependence
    Its full benefits are best experienced with supported IDEs, potentially limiting its utility in environments outside of those IDEs.

Apache Flex features and specs

  • Rich User Interface
    Apache Flex allows developers to create highly interactive web applications with rich UI elements and animations, enhancing user experience.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    Flex offers the ability to develop applications that run consistently across multiple platforms including browsers and desktops, saving time and effort in development.
  • Mature Framework
    Having been around since the early 2000s, Flex is a mature and stable framework, which means it has a rich set of features and is well-documented.
  • Component-Based Development
    Flex supports component-based development, allowing for modular and reusable code, which can streamline the development process and improve maintainability.
  • Strong Community Support
    Apache Flex has a strong community of developers who contribute to its continuous improvement and provide support through forums, mailing lists, and documentation.
  • Integrated Development Environment (IDE) Support
    Flex is compatible with several IDEs, including Adobe Flash Builder, which offers tools and features that enhance the development process.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Flex

  • Declining Popularity
    As newer technologies like HTML5, JavaScript frameworks (React, Angular, Vue), and CSS advances have gained traction, the popularity of Apache Flex has waned.
  • Dependency on Flash
    Historically, Flex applications heavily relied on Adobe Flash Player, which is now obsolete and no longer supported by most modern browsers.
  • Performance Issues
    Flex applications can sometimes suffer from performance issues, particularly with complex user interfaces or large datasets, making the user experience less smooth.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers new to Flex or ActionScript, the learning curve can be quite steep, requiring time to become proficient and productive.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    Flex does not provide strong native support for mobile applications, which is a significant drawback in today's mobile-first development environment.
  • Smaller Talent Pool
    Due to its declining usage, finding skilled Apache Flex developers can be challenging compared to more popular and current technologies.

Wallaby.js videos

introduction to wallaby.js STEP1(make library as jQuery plugin)

Apache Flex videos

No Apache Flex videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wallaby.js and Apache Flex)
Developer Tools
30 30%
70% 70
Development Tools
22 22%
78% 78
Rapid Application Development
Development
19 19%
81% 81

User comments

Share your experience with using Wallaby.js and Apache Flex. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wallaby.js should be more popular than Apache Flex. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wallaby.js mentions (7)

  • Are there any continuous testing tools with real-time line-by-line IDE feedback for Rust?
    Basically I'm looking for https://wallabyjs.com/ for Rust. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Testing in ReScript
    Besides bindings for JavaScript libraries, there is rescript-test - a lightweight test framework written in ReScript for ReScript. I have heard that some people like it, but for me, it lacks coverage output and Wallaby support. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • I'd like to use a REPL in my workflow for getting feedback on my code. Is this a reasonable ask? If not, how do you check your code as you go?
    I’m a Clojure(script) dev learning TS. My Clojure REPL flow is Cursive + IntelliJ. The closest equivalent I’ve found is https://quokkajs.com for inline evaluation and https://wallabyjs.com for test evaluation. Both are paid products but have free 30 day evaluation periods. Both work in IntelliJ and VsCode. Source: over 2 years ago
  • [AskJS] Current Issues with Jest Output and Workflow
    Https://wallabyjs.com/ covers pretty much every testing related needs for me. Source: about 3 years ago
  • jest package with highlighting results in window
    I recently switched from webstorm to emacs ( I'm super noob in emacs and lisp :) ) and one tool which I need was wallaby but unfortunately I didn't find anything like that for emacs. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Apache Flex mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wallaby.js and Apache Flex, you can also consider the following products

WompMobile - WompMobile offers tow kind of functions – first creating new mobile apps and secondly converting the websites into mobile applications.

Apache Cordova - Platform for building native mobile applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript

Oracle Mobile Application - Oracle Mobile Application framework or Oracle Mobile Application development platform is a hybrid mobile framework for rapidly developing single source applications for many platforms and devices.

jQuery Mobile - jQuery Mobile

AppGyver Composer - Visual enterprise-grade low code mobile app builder

PhoneGap - Easily create apps using the web technologies you know and love: HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.