Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

W3C Mobile Checker VS Pixi.js

Compare W3C Mobile Checker VS Pixi.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

W3C Mobile Checker logo W3C Mobile Checker

Make websites work better on mobile devices

Pixi.js logo Pixi.js

Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices
  • W3C Mobile Checker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-28
  • Pixi.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14

W3C Mobile Checker features and specs

  • Standard Compliance
    W3C Mobile Checker helps ensure that web pages comply with web standards and best practices set by the World Wide Web Consortium. This is crucial for maintaining consistency and accessibility across different devices.
  • Mobile Compatibility
    It specifically focuses on checking the mobile-responsiveness of a website, which is increasingly important as more users access the web from mobile devices.
  • Error Identification
    The tool identifies issues related to mobile design and functionality, allowing developers to fix problems that might hinder the mobile user experience.
  • Improved SEO
    By ensuring mobile compatibility, the W3C Mobile Checker can indirectly contribute to better search engine optimization, since mobile-friendliness is a ranking factor for search engines.
  • Free and Open Access
    Being a tool developed by W3C, it is freely accessible online, making it easy for developers to use without any cost barriers.

Possible disadvantages of W3C Mobile Checker

  • Limited to Mobile Checks
    While focused on mobile compatibility, it does not provide comprehensive validation for other aspects of a website, such as desktop compatibility or performance.
  • Alpha Release
    Being an 'alpha' version, it may have incomplete features or bugs, potentially leading to inaccurate validation results or a less polished user experience.
  • Technical Knowledge Requirement
    Developers need some level of technical understanding to interpret the results and implement recommended changes, which can be challenging for beginners.
  • No Direct Fix Suggestions
    While it identifies issues, the tool may not provide detailed suggestions or solutions on how to fix the identified problems, requiring additional research or expertise from the user.
  • Outdated Information
    Web technologies and standards evolve quickly, and as an alpha version, there's a risk that some checks might be based on outdated standards or practices.

Pixi.js features and specs

  • High Performance
    Pixi.js utilizes WebGL to deliver high-performance rendering, which is ideal for building fast and responsive web applications and games.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple platforms, allowing developers to build applications that work seamlessly across different devices, including desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Pixi.js has comprehensive and well-documented resources that help developers understand how to use the library effectively, including tutorials and examples.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The library comes with a wide range of features such as textures, sprites, and filters, enabling developers to create visually complex and appealing content.
  • Active Community
    Pixi.js benefits from a large and active community, which means frequent updates, a wealth of plugins, and abundant community support.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source library, Pixi.js is free to use and modify, making it accessible to developers with different levels of expertise and budgets.

Possible disadvantages of Pixi.js

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its extensive documentation, beginners may find Pixi.js challenging to learn and integrate into their projects because of its extensive feature set.
  • WebGL Dependencies
    While WebGL provides high performance, it can also cause compatibility issues on older devices or browsers that do not fully support WebGL.
  • Limited 3D Capabilities
    Pixi.js is primarily a 2D rendering engine, so it may not be suitable for projects that require advanced 3D graphics and interactions.
  • Size
    Compared to simpler libraries, Pixi.js can be relatively large in terms of file size, which could impact the loading times of web applications, especially on slower networks.
  • Complex Debugging
    Debugging issues in Pixi.js can be complex, especially in large applications, as it often involves low-level graphics operations and WebGL debugging tools.

W3C Mobile Checker videos

No W3C Mobile Checker videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Pixi.js videos

PixiJS Crash Course

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to W3C Mobile Checker and Pixi.js)
Website Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
CMS
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using W3C Mobile Checker and Pixi.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pixi.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

W3C Mobile Checker mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of W3C Mobile Checker yet. Tracking of W3C Mobile Checker recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Pixi.js mentions (5)

  • Release Radar • March 2024 Edition
    If you're into video game dev, then PixiJS is something you need to know about. It's a HTML5 game engine that provides a lightweight 2D library across all devices. This latest update has a new package structure, custom builds, graphics API overhaul, and lots more. You can read about all these changes in the PixiJS Migration Guide. Also big congrats to PixiJS for being part of the open source community for ten... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Advice about useful libraries to create a 2D car game (hill climb racing style)
    I would need a renderer to display the graphics of my calculations on the "backend". After some research I think pixijs which is written in TS could be a great tool. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is programming just not for me?
    And if that seems to up your alley you could look into Javascript game/renderer frameworks. They have 2D engines like https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser or https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs . Or my personal choice A-Frame which is a 3D, AR and VR engine (XR) https://github.com/aframevr/ . Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pixie – A full-featured 2D graphics library for Nim
    This has a high risk of being confused with pixi.js: https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Custome game engine: what stack ?
    WebGL, I hear, has a similar API to OpenGL. (Also, WebGPU is coming at some point.) Or, you could use a thin library that handles the WebGL drawing of sprites for you. I prefer that option over using a full game engine: I find it's better to only include dependencies when they become necessary. I recently tried a web rendering library called PixiJS, and it seemed like a pretty clean and nice-sized API, and... Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing W3C Mobile Checker and Pixi.js, you can also consider the following products

Dimensions Toolkit - Chrome Extension for designers to test responsive websites.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Flexbox Grid - Grid based on CSS3 flexbox

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

One Click Test - Tool for quickly testing your design layout in one click.

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.