Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

W3C Mobile Checker VS Jekyll

Compare W3C Mobile Checker VS Jekyll and see what are their differences

InfinyHost
Smart hosting solutions for small businesses, eCommerce, and personal websites. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

W3C Mobile Checker logo W3C Mobile Checker

Make websites work better on mobile devices

Jekyll logo Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
  • W3C Mobile Checker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-28
  • Jekyll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17

W3C Mobile Checker features and specs

  • Standard Compliance
    W3C Mobile Checker helps ensure that web pages comply with web standards and best practices set by the World Wide Web Consortium. This is crucial for maintaining consistency and accessibility across different devices.
  • Mobile Compatibility
    It specifically focuses on checking the mobile-responsiveness of a website, which is increasingly important as more users access the web from mobile devices.
  • Error Identification
    The tool identifies issues related to mobile design and functionality, allowing developers to fix problems that might hinder the mobile user experience.
  • Improved SEO
    By ensuring mobile compatibility, the W3C Mobile Checker can indirectly contribute to better search engine optimization, since mobile-friendliness is a ranking factor for search engines.
  • Free and Open Access
    Being a tool developed by W3C, it is freely accessible online, making it easy for developers to use without any cost barriers.

Possible disadvantages of W3C Mobile Checker

  • Limited to Mobile Checks
    While focused on mobile compatibility, it does not provide comprehensive validation for other aspects of a website, such as desktop compatibility or performance.
  • Alpha Release
    Being an 'alpha' version, it may have incomplete features or bugs, potentially leading to inaccurate validation results or a less polished user experience.
  • Technical Knowledge Requirement
    Developers need some level of technical understanding to interpret the results and implement recommended changes, which can be challenging for beginners.
  • No Direct Fix Suggestions
    While it identifies issues, the tool may not provide detailed suggestions or solutions on how to fix the identified problems, requiring additional research or expertise from the user.
  • Outdated Information
    Web technologies and standards evolve quickly, and as an alpha version, there's a risk that some checks might be based on outdated standards or practices.

Jekyll features and specs

  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages of Jekyll

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.

W3C Mobile Checker videos

No W3C Mobile Checker videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Jekyll videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to W3C Mobile Checker and Jekyll)

W3C Mobile Checker

Jekyll

Website Builder
100 100%
Website Builder
0% 0
CMS
3 3%
CMS
97% 97
Blogging
0 0%
Blogging
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using W3C Mobile Checker and Jekyll. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare W3C Mobile Checker and Jekyll

W3C Mobile Checker Reviews

We have no reviews of W3C Mobile Checker yet.
Be the first one to post

Jekyll Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
Jekyll is a static site generator often used to create blogs and websites, similar to Gitbook in its ability to generate documentation from markdown files. Jekyll is built in Ruby and is known for its flexibility and ease of use. It also has a large community and a wide variety of plugins and themes available. Jekyll's main advantage is that it is highly customizable,...
Source: www.archbee.com
11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby and we would say it's simpler, free, and open-source CMS software.
Source: medevel.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Jekyll isn’t strict with its content location. It expects pages in the root of your site, and will build whatever’s there. Here’s how you might organize these pages in your Jekyll site root:
Source: www.freecodecamp.org
9 Reasons I Think Craft is the Best CMS on the Market Today
Craft CMS is simple, minimalistic, agile and has every capability a modern CMS framework needs. Over the past ten years we have worked with every CMS you could think of (Wordpress, Drupal, Rails+ActiveAdmin, Ghost, Weebly, DjangoCMS, Jekyll, Joomla, Tumblr, Squarespace, Expression Engine, Statamic, Blogger)… here are the reasons why we’ve landed firmly with Craft as our №1...
Source: hackernoon.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 194 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

W3C Mobile Checker mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of W3C Mobile Checker yet. Tracking of W3C Mobile Checker recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Jekyll mentions (194)

  • How to create a blog with Quartz, GitHub, and Cloudflare
    If you don't want to use Jekyll as your static site generator for GitHub Pages and you want to have a custom domain for your GitHub Pages. This post is for you! - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Blogging with Obsidian and Jekyll
    Jekyll is a static site generator that transforms Markdown files into a fully functional website. Everything is generated into plain HTML, which makes it simple to deploy on platforms like GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Create a Blogging Platform With No Backend (Zero Hosting Fee)
    Obviously, there are a dozen choices for generating static websites (efficiently and quickly), from the classic Jekyll to the new Next.js. And you are good to go with any of them as long as your confident with it. I choose 11ty because:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • It's easy to dev blog
    In your repository settings you need to turn on GitHub Pages to make it pull Jekyll content (that's the magic✨ default GitHub Pages build tool) from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • How to build a blog with NodeJS
    If you're looking to start a blog (or if you're thinking of redesigning yours although you haven't posted in 2 years), you'll stumble upon a lot of options and it can be incredibly daunting; and if you stumble with the newest Josh's post about his stack it is easy to feel overwhelmed with the shown stack. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing W3C Mobile Checker and Jekyll, you can also consider the following products

Dimensions Toolkit - Chrome Extension for designers to test responsive websites.

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

One Click Test - Tool for quickly testing your design layout in one click.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Flexbox Grid - Grid based on CSS3 flexbox

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Loading...