Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

W3C Mobile Checker VS ASP.NET

Compare W3C Mobile Checker VS ASP.NET and see what are their differences

Umso
The Website Builder for Startups featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

W3C Mobile Checker logo W3C Mobile Checker

Make websites work better on mobile devices

ASP.NET logo ASP.NET

ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
  • W3C Mobile Checker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-28
  • ASP.NET Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-29

W3C Mobile Checker features and specs

  • Standard Compliance
    W3C Mobile Checker helps ensure that web pages comply with web standards and best practices set by the World Wide Web Consortium. This is crucial for maintaining consistency and accessibility across different devices.
  • Mobile Compatibility
    It specifically focuses on checking the mobile-responsiveness of a website, which is increasingly important as more users access the web from mobile devices.
  • Error Identification
    The tool identifies issues related to mobile design and functionality, allowing developers to fix problems that might hinder the mobile user experience.
  • Improved SEO
    By ensuring mobile compatibility, the W3C Mobile Checker can indirectly contribute to better search engine optimization, since mobile-friendliness is a ranking factor for search engines.
  • Free and Open Access
    Being a tool developed by W3C, it is freely accessible online, making it easy for developers to use without any cost barriers.

Possible disadvantages of W3C Mobile Checker

  • Limited to Mobile Checks
    While focused on mobile compatibility, it does not provide comprehensive validation for other aspects of a website, such as desktop compatibility or performance.
  • Alpha Release
    Being an 'alpha' version, it may have incomplete features or bugs, potentially leading to inaccurate validation results or a less polished user experience.
  • Technical Knowledge Requirement
    Developers need some level of technical understanding to interpret the results and implement recommended changes, which can be challenging for beginners.
  • No Direct Fix Suggestions
    While it identifies issues, the tool may not provide detailed suggestions or solutions on how to fix the identified problems, requiring additional research or expertise from the user.
  • Outdated Information
    Web technologies and standards evolve quickly, and as an alpha version, there's a risk that some checks might be based on outdated standards or practices.

ASP.NET features and specs

  • Performance
    ASP.NET is known for its high performance and scalability. It compiles server-side code to DLL files, which is executed on the server side, thereby speeding up the application's response time.
  • Security
    ASP.NET provides built-in security features like form authentication and Windows authentication, as well as protection against common threats such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and request forgery.
  • Rich Toolbox
    Visual Studio, the Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for ASP.NET, offers a rich toolbox with a plethora of controls, automatic deployment features, and other tools that significantly speed up development.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform framework, which means you can run your web applications on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Community and Support
    ASP.NET has a strong community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to problems and ensuring continuous improvement and support.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET

  • Learning Curve
    The framework can be complex for beginners, especially those without experience in C# or the .NET ecosystem.
  • Cost
    While ASP.NET Core is free and open-source, some advanced features and tools require a Visual Studio subscription, which can be expensive.
  • Hosting
    Although ASP.NET Core has improved in terms of cross-platform hosting, traditional ASP.NET applications are primarily optimized for Windows servers, limiting hosting options.
  • Resource Intensive
    ASP.NET applications can be more resource-intensive than applications built with some other frameworks, which can lead to higher infrastructure costs.
  • Complexity
    The framework offers a lot of features and functionalities, which can sometimes make it overly complex and harder to manage for smaller projects.

W3C Mobile Checker videos

No W3C Mobile Checker videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

ASP.NET videos

+ Add

Build Rating and Review System in ASP.NET MVC and Entity Framework

More videos:

  • Review - ASP.NET MVC - Review 0
  • Review - IMDeanyP Movie Review Site - ASP.NET / C# / SQL Server / MVC / Entity Framework

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to W3C Mobile Checker and ASP.NET)

W3C Mobile Checker

ASP.NET

Website Builder
100 100%
Website Builder
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
CMS
100 100%
CMS
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using W3C Mobile Checker and ASP.NET. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare W3C Mobile Checker and ASP.NET

W3C Mobile Checker Reviews

We have no reviews of W3C Mobile Checker yet.
Be the first one to post

ASP.NET Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
ASP.NET’s got that Microsoft muscle, a powerhouse of a framework for building dynamic web services and more. It lets you roll out robust websites with the smoothness that comes with deep pockets. Perfect for .NET software development teams.
Source: tms-outsource.com
Top 10 Phoenix Framework Alternatives
Moving over to the .NET platform, Asp.Net is an open-source web framework developed by Microsoft that allows developers to build dynamic web pages, apps, and services using HTML, JavaScript, and CSS.
Source: blog.back4app.com
10 Ruby on Rails Alternatives For Web Development in 2022
Last but not least, a back-end web framework created by Microsoft for the development of dynamic web pages - ASP.NET. Built on top of C# it is one the fastest frameworks available on the market. ASP.NET is capable of handling 7.01 million requests per second while Django handles only 79,266 requests. The framework is mainly used for building web applications, APIs,...
Source: www.ideamotive.co

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ASP.NET seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

W3C Mobile Checker mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of W3C Mobile Checker yet. Tracking of W3C Mobile Checker recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ASP.NET mentions (22)

  • 30,656 Pages of Books About the .NET Ecosystem: C#, Blazor, ASP.NET, & T-SQL
    Most of the books teach C# and .NET, ASP.NET, Blazor, or T-SQL. I also found some .NET-specific coverage of wider topics: architecture and design, concurrency, automated tests, functional programming, and dependency injection. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Diversify Your Tech Stack: Uncovering Powerful Node js Alternatives
    Built by Microsoft, .NET is a high-performance application platform that uses C# for programming. .NET is cross-platform and comes with plenty of libraries and APIs covering collections, networking, and machine learning to build different types of applications. ASP.NET Core widens the .NET developer platform with libraries and tools geared towards web applications. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • C# Fundamentals
    Web Applications: ASP.NET, a powerful framework for building web applications, is primarily based on C#. Developers can create dynamic websites, web APIs, and services with ASP.NET. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release
    The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?
    Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing W3C Mobile Checker and ASP.NET, you can also consider the following products

Dimensions Toolkit - Chrome Extension for designers to test responsive websites.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

One Click Test - Tool for quickly testing your design layout in one click.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Flexbox Grid - Grid based on CSS3 flexbox

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Loading...