Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

W3C Markup Validation Service VS Jekyll

Compare W3C Markup Validation Service VS Jekyll and see what are their differences

Zarla
Zarla: The AI Website Builder for Local Businesses featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

W3C Markup Validation Service logo W3C Markup Validation Service

Validates HTML markup of web pages, one at a time.

Jekyll logo Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
  • W3C Markup Validation Service Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-30
  • Jekyll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17

W3C Markup Validation Service features and specs

  • Standards Compliance
    The W3C Markup Validation Service ensures that your web pages conform to established web standards, helping to improve web interoperability and accessibility.
  • Error Identification
    The service identifies errors and warnings in your HTML and XHTML documents, making it easier to debug and fix these issues to improve code quality.
  • Improved Compatibility
    By validating your markup, you can better ensure that your web pages are compatible with various browsers and devices, providing a more consistent user experience.
  • Free of Charge
    The validation service is provided by W3C at no cost, making it an accessible tool for developers of all levels to enhance their web projects.
  • Educational Tool
    For beginners in web development, the W3C Validator can serve as an educational resource by highlighting common mistakes and promoting best practices in coding.

Possible disadvantages of W3C Markup Validation Service

  • Limited to Syntax
    The validator primarily checks for syntax errors and does not assess other vital web development aspects such as design or functionality.
  • Outdated Standards
    The tool relies on W3C's standards, which can sometimes lag behind real-world usage and popular web development trends, potentially limiting its relevance.
  • Overly Strict
    The validator can be overly strict, flagging non-critical issues that may not impact user experience but are still considered 'errors' by the tool.
  • Misinterpretation of Results
    Less experienced developers might misinterpret the validator's results, focusing too much on achieving perfect validation without understanding the real impact on usability.
  • Lack of Support for Modern Frameworks
    As a markup validator, it might not fully support or correctly evaluate modern JavaScript frameworks that generate markup dynamically.

Jekyll features and specs

  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages of Jekyll

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.

W3C Markup Validation Service videos

+ Add

A Walkthrough the W3C Markup Validation Service

Jekyll videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to W3C Markup Validation Service and Jekyll)

W3C Markup Validation Service

Jekyll

SEO
100 100%
SEO
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
CMS
100% 100
SEO Tools
100 100%
SEO Tools
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
Blogging
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using W3C Markup Validation Service and Jekyll. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare W3C Markup Validation Service and Jekyll

W3C Markup Validation Service Reviews

We have no reviews of W3C Markup Validation Service yet.
Be the first one to post

Jekyll Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
Jekyll is a static site generator often used to create blogs and websites, similar to Gitbook in its ability to generate documentation from markdown files. Jekyll is built in Ruby and is known for its flexibility and ease of use. It also has a large community and a wide variety of plugins and themes available. Jekyll's main advantage is that it is highly customizable,...
Source: www.archbee.com
11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby and we would say it's simpler, free, and open-source CMS software.
Source: medevel.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Jekyll isn’t strict with its content location. It expects pages in the root of your site, and will build whatever’s there. Here’s how you might organize these pages in your Jekyll site root:
Source: www.freecodecamp.org
9 Reasons I Think Craft is the Best CMS on the Market Today
Craft CMS is simple, minimalistic, agile and has every capability a modern CMS framework needs. Over the past ten years we have worked with every CMS you could think of (Wordpress, Drupal, Rails+ActiveAdmin, Ghost, Weebly, DjangoCMS, Jekyll, Joomla, Tumblr, Squarespace, Expression Engine, Statamic, Blogger)… here are the reasons why we’ve landed firmly with Craft as our №1...
Source: hackernoon.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jekyll should be more popular than W3C Markup Validation Service. It has been mentiond 195 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

W3C Markup Validation Service mentions (98)

  • HTML Validation
    How to use HTML Validation service 👇 Step 1: Access the HTML validator ● Open the HTML validator in your web browser i.e go to https://validator.w3.org/. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • WebKit Fix: Quirk News.Y Combinator to Skip TextAutoSizing
    Looking at the html of HN's pages, can't blame them really. Running though https://validator.w3.org/ , the result is abysmal. At this rate, if web browsers started requiring sites to output HTML that is somewhere in the realm of normalcy, HN would sooner shut down than consider ever updating. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • We Need to Talk More About Conformance, If We Want to Stop Fantasy HTML
    Whether you’re a frontend developer, lead, or manager, reconsider your expectations and practices if you haven’t yet chosen not to ship erroneous HTML. The more of us decide to talk about using actual HTML on our sites and in our apps, and lead by example, the better for our users and clients, and the better for our craft and profession. On the engineering side of web development, it’s HTML first—if it is HTML. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • What is cross-browser compatibility, and why should you care?
    Validate Your Code Include tools like W3C code validation service and CSS validator to ensure your code meets web standards. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • What You Need to Know About Domain and Hosting
    ===> Click here to run your code through the HTML validator. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Jekyll mentions (195)

  • Building PicoSSG: 'Just Enough Code'
    The static site generator (SSG) landscape is crowded with feature-rich but increasingly complex solutions. As I looked at and used tools like lume, 11ty, lektor, or jekyll, I found myself drowning in configuration options, plugins, and middleware. What started as a simple desire to convert Markdown content into HTML had evolved into learning complex frameworks with steep learning curves. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
  • How to create a blog with Quartz, GitHub, and Cloudflare
    If you don't want to use Jekyll as your static site generator for GitHub Pages and you want to have a custom domain for your GitHub Pages. This post is for you! - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Blogging with Obsidian and Jekyll
    Jekyll is a static site generator that transforms Markdown files into a fully functional website. Everything is generated into plain HTML, which makes it simple to deploy on platforms like GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Create a Blogging Platform With No Backend (Zero Hosting Fee)
    Obviously, there are a dozen choices for generating static websites (efficiently and quickly), from the classic Jekyll to the new Next.js. And you are good to go with any of them as long as your confident with it. I choose 11ty because:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • It's easy to dev blog
    In your repository settings you need to turn on GitHub Pages to make it pull Jekyll content (that's the magic✨ default GitHub Pages build tool) from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing W3C Markup Validation Service and Jekyll, you can also consider the following products

Rocket Validator - Site-wide Accessibility and HTML validation made easy. With a single click, Rocket Validator will check thousands of web pages on your site for Accessibility and HTML conformance, producing a detailed, actionable report on seconds.

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

PageSpeed Insights - PageSpeed is addon for ...

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Total Validator - Total Validator can check your website to help ensure that it is accessible, uses valid HTML and CSS, has no broken links, and is free from spelling mistakes.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Loading...