Software Alternatives & Reviews

w3af VS Charles Proxy

Compare w3af VS Charles Proxy and see what are their differences

w3af logo w3af

w3af is a Web Application Attack and Audit Framework

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy
  • w3af Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

w3af videos

How to use the w3af website scanner in kali Linux

More videos:

  • Tutorial - What is W3af? | How to install Web Application Attack & Audit Framework?
  • Tutorial - W3AF Tutorial Part II using the GUI

Charles Proxy videos

No Charles Proxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to w3af and Charles Proxy)
Web Application Security
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Security
37 37%
63% 63
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using w3af and Charles Proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare w3af and Charles Proxy

w3af Reviews

We have no reviews of w3af yet.
Be the first one to post

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, w3af seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

w3af mentions (1)

  • 3 reasons why any website's security is important
    Testing security of your website is easy. There are dozen of web security testing tools out there you can use for free. Arachni and w3af are famous open source security scanners you can use. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Charles Proxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Charles Proxy yet. Tracking of Charles Proxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing w3af and Charles Proxy, you can also consider the following products

Nikto - Nikto is an Open Source (GPL) web server scanner which performs comprehensive tests against web...

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

Burp Suite - Burp Suite is an integrated platform for performing security testing of web applications.

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Acunetix - Audit your website security and web applications for SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other...

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.