Vuo VS DocFX

Thought I'd share my thoughts of building a native Mac app using a pretty niche tool — using a nocode tool called Vuo, and in the process, share a little perspective from someone who's used no-code tools for many, many years and seen similar patterns. Source: over 2 years ago

For those interested, I'm building this using a (mostly) odd no-code tool called Vuo. A Windows version is on the map…sometime…so yes, obviously this is not really for gamers (who are primarily on Windows anyway), but more for those streaming artwork, or doing online teaching etc. Source: over 2 years ago

This is a better looking version of what Java and C# have had for a long time (kudos to the author for that!), is that the inspiration for this tool? https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/tools/windows/javadoc.html https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/ I saw the author mentioned in another comment that they found themselves peeping inside type declaration files "too often". While I do often use sites generated... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Actually, we use it for OptiTune, it's called "docfx" https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/. Source: about 2 years ago

We would really prefer to use a somewhat generic pre-made tool for this (such as DocFX) compared to rolling our own solution. We can roll our own solution... But would prefer not to so that we can minimize development and maintenance overhead. Source: over 2 years ago

I use docfx from microsoft to generate documentation for all my oss libraries. Source: over 2 years ago

My best guess would be that there's a CI/CD pipeline in GitHub that utilizes DocFX to convert the Markdown files to HTML. The constructed HTML files are then placed in an Azure Storage account that configured for Static Website Hosting combined with Azure CDN. Source: over 2 years ago