Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Vuesax VS Three.js

Compare Vuesax VS Three.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Vuesax logo Vuesax

Vuesax is a library of Vuejs components that facilitates front-end development and streamlines work...

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • Vuesax Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

Vuesax features and specs

  • Customizability
    Vuesax offers a high level of customizability, allowing developers to easily modify components through its configuration options to meet the specific needs of their application.
  • Aesthetic Design
    Vuesax components are designed with a modern aesthetic, ensuring that the application has an appealing and contemporary look without extensive design work.
  • Ease of Use
    The documentation and API are straightforward, making it easier for developers to understand and implement the components quickly.
  • Android Inspired
    Vuesax's components are inspired by Android-style aesthetics, making it ideal for developers who wish to create interfaces similar to native Android applications.

Possible disadvantages of Vuesax

  • Smaller Community
    Compared to more established UI libraries like Vuetify or BootstrapVue, Vuesax has a smaller community which can mean fewer third-party resources or community-driven solutions.
  • Limited Features
    While Vuesax provides many useful components, it may not have as many features or as comprehensive a set of components as larger UI frameworks.
  • Non-standard Design Language
    The unique design language that Vuesax employs might not conform to more traditional design paradigms that some users might expect, making it less suitable for applications aiming for a universal look.
  • Progress and Updates
    The library may not be updated as frequently as other more popular libraries, potentially leading to issues with compatibility with new versions of Vue or missing out on the latest UI/UX trends.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Vuesax videos

Vuetify vs Vuesax: A Quick Look At Both

More videos:

  • Review - Vue Component Library Vuesax - Getting Started

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Vuesax and Three.js)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Vuesax and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Vuesax and Three.js

Vuesax Reviews

14 Best Vue UI Component Libraries 2023
It supports and integrates with many of the best tools available to front-end developers, such as Sass, Typescript, and VuePress. Even though Vuesax is not as widely used as other Vue UI component libraries, the fact that it’s independent from any strict design language will make your Vue app stand out from the crowd. You can use it for its unique design to give your web...
Source: athemes.com

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 248 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Vuesax mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Vuesax yet. Tracking of Vuesax recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 days ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Vuesax and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

Vuetify - Material Component Framework for VueJS 2

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Buefy - Lightweight UI components for Vue.js based on Bulma

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Bootstrap Vue - Quickly integrate Bootstrap v4 components with Vue.js

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.