Based on our record, Vue.js seems to be a lot more popular than aerc. While we know about 393 links to Vue.js, we've tracked only 20 mentions of aerc. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The MVC approach is dominating the application market at the time of writing. The three main front-end frameworks which do this are React, Vue and Angular but there are many, many more. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Something I have already seen in many different code bases using frontend libraries like React and Vue is that developers use advanced state management solutions (e.g. Redux, Vuex, or Pinia) way too often. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Vue.js Vuejs.org Progressive framework for building reactive interfaces. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Our monolith is built with Laravel and Vue.js, where Vue.js powers dynamic features at the expense of performance, since it runs completely on the client-side. For performance-sensitive features, we rely on Blade (Laravel's template engine) with raw JavaScript or jQuery, resulting in a more complex and less developer-friendly approach. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Lexical is an open source project and considered the successor of Draft.js. It is primarily developed by Meta, licensed under MIT. It is not restricted to React, but supports Vanilla JS, too. The flexibility enables us to integrate it with other JS libraries such as Svelte and Vue. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
How about (inspired by another HN post) - a rebuild of a TUI for email, given how its built: https://blog.sergeantbiggs.net/posts/aerc-a-well-crafted-tui-for-email/ https://aerc-mail.org/ It seems that building a version of this Aerc Email TUi with Instant is a completely doable? Might be an interesting tutorial to build out an Instant FroBenDB (Instant is an instant Front-BackendDB :-) --- btu the txtual nature... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
The official site has video of it in use. https://aerc-mail.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
You have some points, for some I do think it isn't as bad as you write. FWIW, some comments inline. > - You can't subscribe to a single PR/bug/feature-request thread. Subscription to the mailing list is all-or-nothing. And no, setting up email filters is not a reasonable solution. You can use tools like public-inbox or lei, the former is hosted for bigger projects on https://lore.kernel.org/ If you're interested,... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
> Another problem is how badly email threading is displayed in these clients. Email UI is still abysmal. Fair point. However, given that the current alternative is "use another service entirely (e.g. GitHub)", I think it would be fair to assume that devs could choose a good e-mail client and learn how to format such e-mails correctly. It works for Linux, for instance. I started using Aerc, and I love it:... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
For fans of Mutt/NeoMutt looking to try something new, I've been getting a lot of mileage out of Aerc[1] and can recommend it as a somewhat more approachable alternative for the Mutt-curious. [1] https://aerc-mail.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
Mu4e - Starting with version 0.9.8, mu provides an emacs-based e-mail client which uses mu as its back-end: mu4e.
Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps
NeoMutt - NeoMutt is a command-line mail reader. It's a version of https://alternativeto.
AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.
Mutt - Mutt is a small but very powerful text-based mail client for Unix operating systems.