Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Visual Studio Live Share VS FaceCode

Compare Visual Studio Live Share VS FaceCode and see what are their differences

TimeLake.io
Improve team performance continuously with time tracking automation. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Visual Studio Live Share logo Visual Studio Live Share

Real-time collaborative development

FaceCode logo FaceCode

Hire top tech talent with video interviews
  • Visual Studio Live Share Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • FaceCode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20

Visual Studio Live Share features and specs

  • Real-Time Collaboration
    Allows multiple developers to work on the same codebase in real-time, facilitating immediate feedback and pair programming.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Supports both Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code, and can be used across different operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux.
  • Shared Debugging
    Enables shared debugging sessions where both parties can inspect variables, set breakpoints, and step through code together.
  • Seamless Integration
    Integrates well with existing projects and workspaces without the need for additional configuration or setup.
  • Supports Live Share Guest Machines
    Guests can join a Live Share session without needing to clone the repository or set up a development environment identical to the host.
  • Instantaneous Sharing
    Starts sharing immediately with just a few clicks, without needing complex VPNs or file sharing setups.
  • Focused Sessions
    Allows hosts to specify read-only or read/write access, and focus participants' cursors on specific lines of code.

Possible disadvantages of Visual Studio Live Share

  • Performance Issues
    Real-time collaboration can sometimes introduce latency or performance issues, especially over slower internet connections.
  • Limited IDE Support
    Currently, it primarily supports Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code, which may limit its use for teams utilizing other IDEs.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Requires a stable internet connection, making it less reliable in low-bandwidth or unstable network conditions.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code and debugging sessions over the internet may pose security risks if not properly managed, especially for sensitive projects.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a learning curve to understand all the features and effectively integrate it into their workflow.
  • Privacy Issues
    In collaborative debugging or editing, inadvertent exposure of sensitive information like API keys or passwords can occur.

FaceCode features and specs

  • Real-time Collaboration
    FaceCode allows interviewers and candidates to collaborate in real-time, facilitating effective communication and problem-solving during technical interviews.
  • Built-in Video Conferencing
    The platform integrates video conferencing directly into the coding environment, allowing for seamless interaction and reducing the need for external tools.
  • Code Playback Feature
    Interviewers have access to a code playback feature that lets them review the coding process, which is helpful for assessing a candidate's problem-solving approach.
  • Wide Range of Languages Supported
    FaceCode supports a broad array of programming languages, ensuring that candidates can code in the language they are most comfortable with.
  • Comprehensive Interview Reports
    The platform generates detailed reports of the interview, providing insights into candidate performance which aids in informed decision-making.

Possible disadvantages of FaceCode

  • Internet Dependency
    FaceCode requires a stable internet connection, which can be a drawback in situations where connectivity is unreliable.
  • Learning Curve
    Some users may experience a learning curve when adapting to the platform's features, which may initially hinder the interview process.
  • Limited Customization Options
    Users may find the platform's customization options limited, which could impact the tailoring of interview environments to specific needs.
  • Pricing Structure
    The cost associated with using FaceCode might be prohibitive for smaller companies or startups with limited budgets.
  • Potential Technical Issues
    As with any technical platform, there may be occasional bugs or technical issues that disrupt the interview process.

Analysis of Visual Studio Live Share

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Visual Studio Live Share is considered to be a good tool for collaborative development.

Why this product is good

  • Visual Studio Live Share allows developers to collaborate in real-time on the same codebase without needing to clone repositories or perform any setup. It supports instantly sharing your code, debugging sessions, and terminal with peers, which enhances productivity and fosters teamwork. Additionally, Live Share supports a range of IDEs and code editors, including Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code, making it versatile for different development environments. This functionality is particularly valuable for remote work scenarios and educational purposes.

Recommended for

  • Remote development teams looking for seamless collaboration.
  • Developers who frequently engage in pair programming.
  • Educators and students involved in programming courses.
  • Open-source project contributors who need to quickly sync ideas and code.
  • Teams using both Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code who require interoperability.

Analysis of FaceCode

Overall verdict

  • FaceCode is a robust platform that is well-received by recruiters and candidates for its interactive and efficient coding interview capabilities. It is particularly beneficial for tech companies looking to streamline their hiring processes.

Why this product is good

  • FaceCode by HackerEarth is considered good because it provides a comprehensive platform for technical interviews. It offers features like real-time coding collaboration, a variety of coding tasks, and in-depth evaluation tools that help interviewers assess candidates effectively. Additionally, it integrates well with various applicant tracking systems, making the interview process seamless for both candidates and recruiters.

Recommended for

    FaceCode is recommended for technical recruiters, hiring managers, and tech companies seeking to enhance their candidate evaluation process. It's also ideal for organizations that conduct frequent online technical interviews and want a reliable and user-friendly platform to assess software developers.

Visual Studio Live Share videos

+ Add

Collaboration made easy with Visual Studio Live Share

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Visual Studio Live Share

FaceCode videos

+ Add

HackerEarth's FaceCode Launch Event - Feb 3rd, 2021

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Visual Studio Live Share and FaceCode)

Visual Studio Live Share

FaceCode

Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
Hiring And Recruitment
0 0%
Hiring And Recruitment
100% 100
Programming Tools
100 100%
Programming Tools
0% 0
Recruitment
0 0%
Recruitment
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Visual Studio Live Share and FaceCode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Visual Studio Live Share seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Visual Studio Live Share mentions (22)

  • Top 5 Code Collaboration Tools for Remote Work
    Visual Studio Live Share is an extension for the popular Visual Studio Code IDE that allows developers to bring their peers into their editor. You can send an invite link to let your colleagues write, edit, and debug code as if they were in the same physical location as you. This removes the challenges of working remotely when it comes to pair programming and brainstorming together. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Me after trying to use Git with Eclipse
    Have you checked out Live Share? It's included in VS and there's an extension for VS Code. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Are there any Azure platforms/apps for collaborative coding for startups?
    Visual Studio has collaboration tools. Source: about 2 years ago
  • The Benefits of Pair Programming for Problem-Solving
    Pair programming is when two developers work together at one workstation. Not necessarily on the same computer, but they work together on the same programming task. In remote work I love to use Visual Studio Live Share ❤️. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • IDE with concurrent users
    But there's also an extension that MS put out called Live Share. They have a version for both VS and VS Code. I've used the VSC one myself, to great effect. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

FaceCode mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of FaceCode yet. Tracking of FaceCode recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Visual Studio Live Share and FaceCode, you can also consider the following products

CodeShare.io - Realtime code sharing for developers

Screenable - Screenable is the video interview platform designed to streamline applicant screenings and make the recruitment journey more efficient and effective.

CodeTogether - Live share IDEs and coding sessions. See changes in real time.

InterviewApp - Video Interviewing Made Simple To Build & Coach Modern Teams

Teletype for Atom - Collaborate in real time in Atom

HireFunnel - Automated Video Interviewing Platform

Loading...