Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Vimwiki VS Marked

Compare Vimwiki VS Marked and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Vimwiki logo Vimwiki

Vimwiki is a personal wiki for Vim โ€“ interlinked, plain text files written in a markup language.

Marked logo Marked

Marked takes Markdown textโ€“a simple syntax you can learn in minutesโ€“and turns it into beautiful...
  • Vimwiki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • Marked Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-25

Vimwiki features and specs

  • Integration with Vim
    Vimwiki is directly integrated into Vim, allowing users to stay within their preferred text editor without needing to switch applications. This enhances productivity and gives users the benefit of Vim's powerful text editing features.
  • Fast and Lightweight
    As a plugin for Vim, Vimwiki is fast and lightweight, without the overhead of more resource-intensive applications. This is beneficial for users who want a quick and efficient way to manage notes and wikis.
  • Customizable and Extensible
    Vimwiki offers customization options to suit different workflows, allowing users to tailor the plugin to their specific needs. Being open-source, it can also be extended with additional features by those with the necessary skills.
  • Offline Access
    Vimwiki operates completely offline, making it ideal for users who need access to their information without an internet connection.
  • Simple Syntax
    The syntax used in Vimwiki is straightforward and easy to learn, which simplifies the process of creating and managing pages, links, and to-do lists efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Vimwiki

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For users who are not already familiar with Vim, there is a significant learning curve. Vim's modal editing and command structure can be complex for new users to master.
  • Limited Collaboration Features
    Vimwiki is primarily designed for individual use and lacks native support for collaborative editing features, which might be a drawback for teams needing to work together on wikis.
  • Dependency on Vim
    Since Vimwiki is built for Vim, it relies on users having Vim installed and being comfortable using it as their text editor, which can be a limitation for those preferring other editors.
  • No Native Cloud Sync
    Vimwiki does not offer built-in cloud synchronization, requiring users to set up external tools or version control systems to access their wikis across different devices.
  • Limited Multimedia Handling
    Vimwiki primarily supports text-based content, and its handling of multimedia content like images and videos is limited, which can be restrictive for users who need rich media documentation.

Marked features and specs

  • Live Preview
    Marked offers a live preview feature that allows users to see real-time updates of Markdown files as they write. This helps in quickly catching formatting issues and improves the writing workflow.
  • Export Options
    The app supports a variety of export options, including HTML, PDF, and more, allowing for flexibility in sharing and publishing documents in different formats.
  • Custom Styles
    Users can apply custom styles to their Markdown documents, providing the ability to tailor the appearance of the document preview and output to fit specific aesthetic or branding needs.
  • Multi-Device Sync
    Marked seamlessly integrates with other Markdown editors and cloud services, facilitating synchronized work across multiple devices and platforms.
  • Document Navigation
    Features such as document outline and table of contents make it easier to navigate large Markdown documents, improving accessibility and efficiency in editing.

Possible disadvantages of Marked

  • Limited to macOS
    Marked is only available for macOS, which limits its accessibility for users on other operating systems, such as Windows or Linux.
  • Learning Curve
    Users who are new to Markdown or the specific features of Marked may experience a learning curve to fully leverage all the advanced options offered by the application.
  • Cost
    Although Marked provides a range of features, it is a paid application. Some users might find the cost prohibitive compared to free Markdown editors available in the market.
  • Overkill for Simple Tasks
    For users who require basic Markdown editing and preview, Marked might offer more features than necessary, which can make it seem overly complex for simple tasks.

Vimwiki videos

My Semi-Complete VimWiki Workflow

More videos:

  • Review - vimwiki - Notetaking with Markdown and Preview - Linux TUI

Marked videos

Marked || Rant Review

More videos:

  • Review - Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones - Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Vimwiki and Marked)
Note Taking
100 100%
0% 0
Markdown Editor
0 0%
100% 100
Knowledge Management
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Vimwiki and Marked. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Marked should be more popular than Vimwiki. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Vimwiki mentions (17)

  • Ask HN: Did anyone write a book in Nano?
    I wrote a manuscript in vim a couple Novembers ago, for NaNoWrimo. I used a couple plugins, primarily Goyo [1] to add some margins, but otherwise, yeah, plain vim. I don't think it was really any more productive than my current workflow in Obsidian. Vim keybindings are more useful for editing than for writing (and for editing code in particular, where the changes you're making are much more structured). Also,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • What are some ways you used Python to make YOUR life easier?
    I have created full on programs to systematically created screenshots with the game emulators with RetroArch. Also an automation tool to use a preexisting program named chdman that converts files into a needed format (also unpacking from archives). A little Python script to create a recents list of files for Vimwiki. I also created a program to access ๐ŸŒˆ emojis ๐ŸŒˆ. I wrote my own GE Proton downloader and manager.... Source: about 3 years ago
  • Lightweight and efficient CLI note taking app
    I use VimWiki inside of Neovim, with additional Plugins/configurations. Lightweight and let's you use the power of (Neo)Vim. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Note-taking help. Zettelkasten method
    Well, Zettelkasten looks to me much like wiki. And standard wiki solution for vim is https://vimwiki.github.io/ and it should work quite well for you. Also, it is all plain text files so conversion should not be that difficult. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Ask HN: System to capture personal notes on meetings and project progress
    I end up taking linear notes in a text file, with un-resolved or in-progress items at the bottom. They get pushed downward linearly until they are finished, at which point they get immortalized in the greppable daily log above. Requires a lot of discipline and doesn't have a lot of structure, but having the "working area" next to the journal has served me well. I use vimwiki[1] for most of the editing, in addition... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
View more

Marked mentions (26)

  • The Emacsification of Software
    I came here to recommend Marked: https://marked2app.com But...I like MDV. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Ghostmd: Ghostty but for Markdown Notes
    > This looks really nice, but I suppose I might ask the hard questions - how does this compare to Obsidian, To be honest, other than both of them allowing you to write markdown, they're not comparable. Obsidian is the current favorite of the "make a second brain" crowd which is based the concept of a Zettelkasten [1]. There are thousands of plugins to customize Obsidian to turn it into whatever you want. It just... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: Where are the good Markdown to PDF tools (that meet these requirements)?
    Iโ€™ve not used it for very large documents, but Iโ€™ve been very happy with the fidelity of conversion using Marked 2 (https://marked2app.com) I believe itโ€™s Mac only. I use it sometimes when Iโ€™m creating PDFs from my personal documentation to share more publicly, which I keep in Markdown and deploy on Gitlab Pages as a static site. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Epub rendering with Pandoc
    I write a LOT of documentation in Markdown for $DAYJOB. I normally use Marked2 (not free, but I paid for my license 7-8 years ago) or MacDown (free) to preview them, and to export them to PDF. Both of these programs are specific to macOS, but a web search for "markdown editor" turns up a few dozen others, for other platforms. Most of these will have an "export to PDF" function built into them. Source: over 2 years ago
  • MdBook โ€“ Create book from Markdown files. Like Gitbook but implemented in Rust
    Marked 2 https://marked2app.com/ is a dedicated viewer for Markdown and other text formats, but it's Mac only. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Vimwiki and Marked, you can also consider the following products

Obsidian.md - A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.

Typora - A minimal Markdown reading & writing app.

Notational FZF - Notational Velocity for Vim.

SuperNotecard - Introducing SuperNotecard. SuperNotecard is an online writing tool that features virtual notecards to help arrange facts or scenes, track details, organize paragraphs, and clarify your composition process.

Org mode - Org: an Emacs Mode for Notes, Planning, and Authoring

Linked Ideas - A macOS/iOS apps to treat ideas as links of concepts.