Based on our record, Parcel should be more popular than Verdaccio. It has been mentiond 101 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Another option is to publish our package is with azure artifacts, npm with free version public. But if we want to make it private, we need to pay or set up our own private npm repository. In this moment is where Verdaccio comes in to help us. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
And finally, we extracted our own Verdaccio setup that we've been using to run our e2e tests in the Nx repo s.t. You can use it for your own plugin development as well. Check out this video for a walkthrough on how this works. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
A local install of Verdaccio running next to our app. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
You may want to look into setting up a “Private NPM Registry”. My company maintains 5-6 apps and have many shared libraries just like you describe. We use Verdaccio. I don’t know our costs. Source: 10 months ago
All my source code is in GitHub, I run my own private NPM Registry (Verdaccio) for my private packages and it also acts as a cache, and I use pnpm instead of npm. Source: 11 months ago
It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Besides Webpack, there are many other popular web bundlers available, such as Parcel, Esbuild, Rollup, and more. They all have their own unique features and strengths, and you should make your decision based on the needs and requirements of your specific project. Please refer to their official websites for details. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Bytesafe - A better way to control your software supply chain
Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
npm - npm is a package manager for Node.
17track - All-in-one package tracking
Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.
rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.