Based on our record, Vercel seems to be a lot more popular than aerc. While we know about 526 links to Vercel, we've tracked only 18 mentions of aerc. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Choosing Vercel was a natural decision as it has become the default method for launching apps that are accessible to a wide audience. The simplicity of configuring environment variables, domains, and other settings facilitated this choice. We have implemented feature branch deployment to guarantee that the code is operational and prepared for peer review. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
Next, we'll deploy our ecommerce website to Vercel (which is a great choice to host your Next.js website). Other hosting options include Netlify and Render. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
This approach has seen a proliferation of platforms that offer this as a service(Netlify, Vercel, Cloudflare etc.) and also a proliferation of frameworks with different strengths and weaknesses(list of frameworks supported cloudflare). - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
Next.js: Highly optimized for production from the start, with features tailored for performance in real-world scenarios, including extensive support for SEO and server-side capabilities. Note: With deployment to Vercel is free and comes with additional free tooling such as website analytics and more. - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
Easily deploy your Next.js app with Vercel by clicking the button below:. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
You have some points, for some I do think it isn't as bad as you write. FWIW, some comments inline. > - You can't subscribe to a single PR/bug/feature-request thread. Subscription to the mailing list is all-or-nothing. And no, setting up email filters is not a reasonable solution. You can use tools like public-inbox or lei, the former is hosted for bigger projects on https://lore.kernel.org/ If you're interested,... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
> Another problem is how badly email threading is displayed in these clients. Email UI is still abysmal. Fair point. However, given that the current alternative is "use another service entirely (e.g. GitHub)", I think it would be fair to assume that devs could choose a good e-mail client and learn how to format such e-mails correctly. It works for Linux, for instance. I started using Aerc, and I love it:... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
For fans of Mutt/NeoMutt looking to try something new, I've been getting a lot of mileage out of Aerc[1] and can recommend it as a somewhat more approachable alternative for the Mutt-curious. [1] https://aerc-mail.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Try aerc, I recently set it up and it was really easy to do. The only tricky part was making it so my password is read from the KDE wallet instead of being stored as plain text in the config file. Source: over 1 year ago
I'm not sure how much longer, but at least for me aerc still works with Outlook e-mails. Source: over 1 year ago
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Mu4e - Starting with version 0.9.8, mu provides an emacs-based e-mail client which uses mu as its back-end: mu4e.
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
NeoMutt - NeoMutt is a command-line mail reader. It's a version of https://alternativeto.
GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub
Mutt - Mutt is a small but very powerful text-based mail client for Unix operating systems.