Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

V (programming language) VS Ruby

Compare V (programming language) VS Ruby and see what are their differences

V (programming language) logo V (programming language)

Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.

Ruby logo Ruby

A dynamic, interpreted, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity
  • V (programming language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-25
  • Ruby Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

We recommend LibHunt Ruby for discovery and comparisons of trending Ruby projects.

V (programming language) features and specs

  • Fast Compilation
    V is designed to compile extremely fast, typically within less than a second, regardless of the size of the codebase.
  • Simplicity
    The syntax is simple and easy to learn, drawing inspiration from languages like Go and Python which reduces the learning curve for new developers.
  • Performance
    V aims to offer high performance akin to C, enabling developers to write highly efficient programs.
  • Safe Programming
    It includes built-in mechanisms to avoid common bugs and aims to provide safety features like immutable data structures and option types.
  • Single Binary
    V produces a single small binary without external dependencies, making distribution straightforward and more secure.
  • Cross-Platform
    V supports cross-compilation out of the box, allowing developers to build applications for multiple operating systems from a single codebase.

Possible disadvantages of V (programming language)

  • Maturing Ecosystem
    As a relatively new language, V's ecosystem, including libraries, frameworks, and community support, is still growing and may not be as mature as more established languages.
  • Limited Tooling
    Compared to more established languages, tools like IDE support, debuggers, and other development utilities are still limited or in early stages.
  • Smaller Community
    The community around V is smaller, which can result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries being available.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the syntax is simple, mastering some of V's advanced features and paradigms may pose a learning curve to developers coming from more mainstream languages.
  • Rapid Changes
    As the language is still evolving, there can be rapid changes and updates which may introduce breaking changes or require frequent revisions of codebases.

Ruby features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Ruby is designed with a focus on simplicity and productivity. Its syntax is easy to read and write, which makes it accessible for beginners as well as enjoyable for seasoned developers.
  • Rich Libraries
    Ruby boasts a large ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, such as Ruby on Rails, which speed up the development process and provide robust solutions for common tasks.
  • Community Support
    Ruby has a vibrant and active community, which means lots of resources, gems (libraries), and forums are available for learning and problem-solving.
  • Dynamic Typing
    Ruby's dynamic typing allows for more flexible and rapid development, as it doesn't require variable type declarations and allows for more expressive code.
  • Meta-Programming
    Ruby has powerful meta-programming capabilities that allow developers to write more abstract and flexible code, reducing repetition and improving code maintainability.

Possible disadvantages of Ruby

  • Performance
    Ruby is generally slower compared to languages like C, Java, and Go. This can be a significant drawback for applications where performance is critically important.
  • Concurrency
    While Ruby has some support for concurrency, it is not as robust as in other languages like Java or Erlang. This can be a limitation for highly concurrent applications.
  • Memory Usage
    Ruby applications tend to consume more memory compared to those written in other languages, which can be a drawback for large-scale applications or resource-constrained environments.
  • Not Suitable for All Types of Applications
    While Ruby excels in web development, particularly with Ruby on Rails, it may not be the best choice for system-level programming, real-time systems, or applications requiring fine-grained control over hardware.
  • Dependency on Gems
    While the rich ecosystem of gems is a strength, it can also be a downside. Over-reliance on third-party libraries can lead to dependencies on potentially unmaintained or poorly supported gems.

V (programming language) videos

V Programming Language (Vlang): First Impression - Mike Shah

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to V and its features (Sydney Computing Society)
  • Review - Testing the NEW "V" programming language!
  • Demo - Presentation of Vlang at IBM
  • Review - An introduction to V (Vlang)

Ruby videos

Ruby Programming Language - Full Course

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to V (programming language) and Ruby)
Programming Language
56 56%
44% 44
OOP
60 60%
40% 40
Generic Programming Language
Development
64 64%
36% 36

User comments

Share your experience with using V (programming language) and Ruby. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare V (programming language) and Ruby

V (programming language) Reviews

We have no reviews of V (programming language) yet.
Be the first one to post

Ruby Reviews

The 10 Best Programming Languages to Learn Today
With the growing popularity of Apple operating systems and applications, having Swift programming skills under your belt is a wise investment. Swift shares some similar characteristics with programming languages Ruby and Python.
Source: ict.gov.ge

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, V (programming language) seems to be a lot more popular than Ruby. While we know about 74 links to V (programming language), we've tracked only 4 mentions of Ruby. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

V (programming language) mentions (74)

  • Koto Programming Language
    > For me the biggest gap in programming languages is a rust like language with a garbage collector, instead of a borrow checker. https://vlang.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Go Is a Well-Designed Language
    I think V [1] is what Go should’ve been. Simple, compiles fast, integrated language tooling, in fact quite similar to Go, but without all the dumb design decisions. Unlike Go, it has sum types, enums, immutable-by-default variables, option/result types, various other goodies and the syntax for for loops actually makes sense. It’s a shame that the compiler is quite buggy, but hopefully that’s going to improve. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Mantis - new file log driver
    Mantis is a type-safe web framework written in V that emphasizes explicit, magic-free code. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Mantis, a web framework written in V
    For development, V offers both an interpreter and watch mode, combining the convenience of scripting languages with the type safety and performance of compiled languages. It even includes built-in channel-compatible concurrency - truly the best of both worlds. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
    What is quite interesting (after looking at their documentation), is that V lang[1] has all that is mentioned: `?`[2], `or`[2], sum types[4], and can return multiple values[5]. [1]: https://vlang.io/ [2]: https://github.com/vlang/v/blob/master/doc/docs.md#optionresult-types-and-error-handling [4]: - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

Ruby mentions (4)

  • What I posted this week about Ruby
    On Thursday, I shared the importance of contributing to Ruby's documentation, and I wanted to show that even a small contribution can help. Thus, I showed a small PR I submitted for the ruby-lang.org website:. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • A full-stack serverless application with AssemblyLift and Next.js
    The counter function is written in Ruby. Since Ruby is an interpreted language, AssemblyLift deploys a customized Ruby 3.1 interpreter compiled to WebAssembly, which executes the function handler. Since the interpreter is somewhat large, the cold-start time of a Ruby function tends to be larger than that of a Rust function. Our counter is being run in the backround, so we're fine with it being a little bit laggy... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Why is no one promoting ruby?
    But, in general I was told use rubyapi.org unless you _really_ want to stick with the ruby-lang.org docs for all you do (which is fine) or to dig more into some object hierarchy, etc. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Looking for pwsh (core/open source, v7) integration w/ rbenv, asdf
    [2] 'rbenv' - https://github.com/rbenv/rbenv - Ruby version management utility. Run something like rbenv install 3.1.1 to install that version on your system (requires related project ruby-build), then rbenv local 3.1.1 in your code's directory to specify that for any ruby command in that directory only, you want to use version 3.1.1 that you installed through rbenv. Does other useful stuff too. Only does Ruby,... Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing V (programming language) and Ruby, you can also consider the following products

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

Go Programming Language - Go, also called golang, is a programming language initially developed at Google in 2007 by Robert...

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation