Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

V (programming language) VS Inferno

Compare V (programming language) VS Inferno and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

V (programming language) logo V (programming language)

Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.

Inferno logo Inferno

An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.
  • V (programming language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-25
  • Inferno Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11

V (programming language) features and specs

  • Fast Compilation
    V is designed to compile extremely fast, typically within less than a second, regardless of the size of the codebase.
  • Simplicity
    The syntax is simple and easy to learn, drawing inspiration from languages like Go and Python which reduces the learning curve for new developers.
  • Performance
    V aims to offer high performance akin to C, enabling developers to write highly efficient programs.
  • Safe Programming
    It includes built-in mechanisms to avoid common bugs and aims to provide safety features like immutable data structures and option types.
  • Single Binary
    V produces a single small binary without external dependencies, making distribution straightforward and more secure.
  • Cross-Platform
    V supports cross-compilation out of the box, allowing developers to build applications for multiple operating systems from a single codebase.

Possible disadvantages of V (programming language)

  • Maturing Ecosystem
    As a relatively new language, V's ecosystem, including libraries, frameworks, and community support, is still growing and may not be as mature as more established languages.
  • Limited Tooling
    Compared to more established languages, tools like IDE support, debuggers, and other development utilities are still limited or in early stages.
  • Smaller Community
    The community around V is smaller, which can result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries being available.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the syntax is simple, mastering some of V's advanced features and paradigms may pose a learning curve to developers coming from more mainstream languages.
  • Rapid Changes
    As the language is still evolving, there can be rapid changes and updates which may introduce breaking changes or require frequent revisions of codebases.

Inferno features and specs

  • High Performance
    Inferno is known for its impressive speed and performance, often comparable to or surpassing many other front-end frameworks and libraries, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
  • React-Like API
    Inferno uses a similar API to React, which makes it easier for developers who are already familiar with React to transition to or integrate Inferno.
  • Compatibility
    Due to its React-like API, Inferno can work with many existing React components and libraries, enhancing its versatility and integration capabilities.
  • Small Size
    Inferno has a small footprint, reducing load times and improving overall application performance, especially on mobile devices and slower networks.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Inferno supports server-side rendering out of the box, allowing for faster initial page loads and better SEO.

Possible disadvantages of Inferno

  • Smaller Community
    Inferno has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to more widely used libraries and frameworks like React, potentially leading to fewer resources, plugins, and support.
  • Limited Third-Party Libraries
    While compatibility with React libraries is a strength, there are still fewer third-party libraries specifically designed for Inferno, which can limit development options in some scenarios.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are not familiar with React, there can be a learning curve associated with understanding the Inferno API and concepts.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Compared to larger projects like React, Inferno may have less frequent updates and new feature releases, which can impact the adoption of the latest web development trends.
  • Less Market Demand
    There is currently less market demand for developers proficient in Inferno compared to those skilled in more popular frameworks and libraries, potentially affecting job prospects and opportunities.

V (programming language) videos

V Programming Language (Vlang): First Impression - Mike Shah

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to V and its features (Sydney Computing Society)
  • Review - Testing the NEW "V" programming language!
  • Demo - Presentation of Vlang at IBM
  • Review - An introduction to V (Vlang)

Inferno videos

Inferno - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Inferno - Movie Review
  • Review - Inferno - Official Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to V (programming language) and Inferno)
Programming Language
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
OOP
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using V (programming language) and Inferno. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare V (programming language) and Inferno

V (programming language) Reviews

We have no reviews of V (programming language) yet.
Be the first one to post

Inferno Reviews

The Best JavaScript Frameworks You’re Not Using
There isn’t an overall number we can use to gauge performance on the chart above, but smaller numbers are better. Obviously, Inferno performs very well again. If you’re a React developer and have a project that requires excellent performance, Inferno is definitely something you should consider. We’ll finish with this from the Inferno “About” page:
Source: jsreport.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, V (programming language) seems to be a lot more popular than Inferno. While we know about 74 links to V (programming language), we've tracked only 2 mentions of Inferno. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

V (programming language) mentions (74)

  • Koto Programming Language
    > For me the biggest gap in programming languages is a rust like language with a garbage collector, instead of a borrow checker. https://vlang.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Go Is a Well-Designed Language
    I think V [1] is what Go should’ve been. Simple, compiles fast, integrated language tooling, in fact quite similar to Go, but without all the dumb design decisions. Unlike Go, it has sum types, enums, immutable-by-default variables, option/result types, various other goodies and the syntax for for loops actually makes sense. It’s a shame that the compiler is quite buggy, but hopefully that’s going to improve. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Mantis - new file log driver
    Mantis is a type-safe web framework written in V that emphasizes explicit, magic-free code. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Mantis, a web framework written in V
    For development, V offers both an interpreter and watch mode, combining the convenience of scripting languages with the type safety and performance of compiled languages. It even includes built-in channel-compatible concurrency - truly the best of both worlds. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
    What is quite interesting (after looking at their documentation), is that V lang[1] has all that is mentioned: `?`[2], `or`[2], sum types[4], and can return multiple values[5]. [1]: https://vlang.io/ [2]: https://github.com/vlang/v/blob/master/doc/docs.md#optionresult-types-and-error-handling [4]: - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

Inferno mentions (2)

  • Solid vs React - the Fastest VS the Most Popular UI Library
    Some might argue that React’s relatively poor performance (it’s still plenty-fast for many apps) is due to Virtual DOM and prioritization of development experience, i.e., clarity over complexity. To counter the first argument - there’s React-like Inferno. For the second one - there’s Solid. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • A Look at Compilation in JavaScript Frameworks
    A VDOM library like Inferno uses this information to compile its JSX directly into pre-optimized node structures. Marko, and Vue hoist their static VDOM nodes outside of their components so that they don't incur the overhead of recreating them on every render. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing V (programming language) and Inferno, you can also consider the following products

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

Go Programming Language - Go, also called golang, is a programming language initially developed at Google in 2007 by Robert...

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

Deku - Functional view library for building UI components as an alternative to React