Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

UXsniff VS Charles Proxy

Compare UXsniff VS Charles Proxy and see what are their differences

UXsniff logo UXsniff

Track user behavior on your website and improve conversions with UXsniff: the user experience watchdog that looks out for you.

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy
  • UXsniff Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-23

UXsniff detects and reports abnormal user behavior, such as manic repeated clicks or scrolls on your website, automatically.

  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

UXsniff

$ Details
freemium $9.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Web Wordpress Shopify Wix

UXsniff features and specs

  • Heatmaps : Yes
  • Session recordings : Yes
  • Clickmaps: Yes
  • Feedback widget : Yes
  • On-site surveys : Yes

Charles Proxy features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UXsniff and Charles Proxy)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
Security
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using UXsniff and Charles Proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare UXsniff and Charles Proxy

UXsniff Reviews

We have no reviews of UXsniff yet.
Be the first one to post

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UXsniff seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UXsniff mentions (1)

  • Can an experienced dev tell me where I'm at skill-wise?
    We have all the skills, just lack of business mind and ideas. That's why I built uxsniff.com. Source: about 2 years ago

Charles Proxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Charles Proxy yet. Tracking of Charles Proxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UXsniff and Charles Proxy, you can also consider the following products

PixelSnap - Measure every pixel on your screen with ease ✨

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

Checklist Design - The best UI and UX practices for production ready design.

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

UI & UX Checklist - Learn, practice & check UI UX laws on a Notion template

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.