Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

UX Archive Animated VS Ant Design System for Figma

Compare UX Archive Animated VS Ant Design System for Figma and see what are their differences

UX Archive Animated logo UX Archive Animated

iOS apps animated user flows

Ant Design System for Figma logo Ant Design System for Figma

A large library of 2100+ handcrafted UI components
  • UX Archive Animated Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22
  • Ant Design System for Figma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

UX Archive Animated features and specs

  • Comprehensive Collection
    UX Archive Animated offers a wide range of well-documented user interactions from popular mobile apps, making it a valuable resource for UX professionals seeking inspiration or reference.
  • Visual Clarity
    The site provides clean and clear animations that help users understand the flow of interactions within an app, which is especially useful for practitioners who need to visualize complex processes.
  • Categorization
    Interactions are well-categorized by types such as 'onboarding,' 'search,' 'checkout,' etc., which makes it easier for users to find specific examples relevant to their current project needs.
  • High-Quality Content
    Each interaction example is carefully selected and usually represents high-quality user experience practices, serving as good benchmarks for design.
  • Frequent Updates
    The platform is regularly updated with new interactions from newly popular apps, ensuring that the content remains fresh and relevant.

Possible disadvantages of UX Archive Animated

  • Limited Interactivity
    While UX Archive Animated offers good visual representations, the limited interactivity of these animations may not provide a fully immersive experience for users trying to understand micro-interactions.
  • Subscription Model
    Some valuable features and full access to the archive require a subscription, which might be a barrier for casual users or those with limited budgets.
  • Focus on Mobile
    The archive primarily focuses on mobile app interactions, potentially leaving out a rich array of web UX examples that could be equally valuable to designers.
  • Lack of Depth in Analysis
    While the animations are visually informative, they often lack detailed explanations or context about why certain UX decisions were made, which can limit their educational value.
  • Search Functionality
    The search functionality could be more advanced, as sometimes it can be challenging to find specific interactions unless they are among the most common categories.

Ant Design System for Figma features and specs

  • Comprehensive Component Library
    Ant Design System for Figma offers a wide range of components that are essential for modern web design, making it easy to create complex user interfaces.
  • Consistency
    The design system ensures consistency across the application by providing standardized components and styles, reducing design inconsistencies.
  • Time Saving
    Using a pre-built design system can significantly speed up the design process, as designers do not need to create components from scratch.
  • Figma Integration
    Seamless integration with Figma allows for real-time collaboration and efficient design workflows.
  • High Quality
    The components are well-designed and align with modern design standards, ensuring a high-quality user experience.
  • Customizability
    Components are highly customizable, allowing designers to tweak them to fit specific project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Ant Design System for Figma

  • Learning Curve
    Designers may face a learning curve when getting started with the system, especially if they are unfamiliar with Ant Design principles.
  • Dependency on Updates
    The design system relies on regular updates to stay current with design trends and Figma updates, meaning outdated versions may lack new features.
  • Limited Flexibility
    While the components are customizable, there could be limitations in design flexibility compared to creating custom components from scratch.
  • Overhead
    For simple projects, using a comprehensive design system might introduce unnecessary overhead, making the process more complex than needed.
  • Initial Cost
    There might be an initial cost associated with acquiring the design system, which could be a barrier for smaller teams or individual designers.
  • Compatibility Issues
    If the design system is not fully compatible with existing design workflows and other tools, it may require adjustments and additional setup time.

Analysis of UX Archive Animated

Overall verdict

  • Yes, UX Archive Animated is considered a good resource for design professionals and enthusiasts interested in the intricacies of UI/UX design, especially in the context of mobile apps.

Why this product is good

  • UX Archive Animated is well-regarded because it provides a comprehensive collection of user interface animations from a wide range of mobile applications. It is a valuable resource for designers looking to study and draw inspiration from real-world examples of animations and transitions.

Recommended for

    This resource is recommended for UX/UI designers, design students, product managers, and anyone interested in understanding and improving mobile app user experiences through animation.

Analysis of Ant Design System for Figma

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Ant Design System for Figma is a strong choice for designers and teams working within the Ant Design ecosystem or those looking for a robust design system that can speed up their workflow. Its depth, usability, and alignment with the web framework make it a valuable tool for maintaining consistency and quality in design work.

Why this product is good

  • Ant Design System for Figma is well-regarded because it offers a comprehensive set of components and design tokens that are aligned with the popular Ant Design framework. This makes it particularly useful for teams that are already using Ant Design in development and want a seamless transition from design to implementation. The system is also praised for its high-quality, customizable components and the efficiency it brings to the design process by enabling rapid prototyping and consistent design outputs.

Recommended for

  • Designers and developers using the Ant Design framework
  • Teams looking for a comprehensive and customizable design system
  • Projects that require rapid prototyping and consistent design outputs
  • Organizations focused on maintaining design and development alignment

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UX Archive Animated and Ant Design System for Figma)
Design Tools
40 40%
60% 60
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Design Inspiration
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using UX Archive Animated and Ant Design System for Figma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UX Archive Animated should be more popular than Ant Design System for Figma. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UX Archive Animated mentions (2)

Ant Design System for Figma mentions (1)

  • Figma: Atomic Design and Auto Layout
    Ant design system is a good resource: Https://antforfigma.com/. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UX Archive Animated and Ant Design System for Figma, you can also consider the following products

UI Patterns - Level up with interactive mobile design patterns

Eva Design System - A free customizable design system

Mobbin - Latest mobile design patterns & elements library

Design Systems Repo - A collection of design system examples and resources

pttrns - iPhone and iPad user interface patterns

UI Playbook - The documented collection of UI components