Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

UseWebhook VS MockServer

Compare UseWebhook VS MockServer and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

UseWebhook logo UseWebhook

Capture and inspect webhooks from your browser, forward to localhost, and replay from history.

MockServer logo MockServer

Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.
  • UseWebhook
    Image date //
    2025-02-26

UseWebhook is a free tool to capture webhooks from your browser.

⚡️ Test webhooks without a server 🔍 Inspect and diff incoming requests 👨‍💻 Forward to localhost, or replay from history ✅ Debug webhooks from Stripe, Paddle, Slack, or anywhere else

No sign up required. Just send HTTP requests to your webhook URL.

  • MockServer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-13

UseWebhook

Website
usewebhook.com
$ Details
-
Startup details
Country
Germany
State
Bavaria
City
Munich
Employees
1 - 9
Edit details

MockServer

Website
mock-server.com
$ Details
Edit details

UseWebhook features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

MockServer features and specs

  • Flexibility
    MockServer provides extensive support for HTTP and HTTPS as well as customizable responses, which allows developers to simulate various scenarios and behaviors in a flexible manner.
  • Scriptable Expectations
    You can define expectations using Java, JavaScript, JSON, and YAML, enabling you to control responses in a programmatic way for more complex testing scenarios.
  • Ease of Integration
    MockServer can be easily integrated with various build tools and CI/CD pipelines, which streamlines the testing process and makes it more efficient.
  • Extensive Documentation
    MockServer comes with comprehensive documentation that includes usage examples, configuration guides, and API references, which helps in decreasing the learning curve.
  • Support for Unit and Integration Testing
    The tool supports both unit and integration testing, making it versatile for testing different levels of a system in isolation.

Possible disadvantages of MockServer

  • Performance Overhead
    Running MockServer can introduce performance overhead, especially in resource-constrained environments, which may affect the speed of the tests.
  • Complex Configuration
    While powerful, the configuration can become complex, particularly for more elaborate mock scenarios, leading to a steeper learning curve for newcomers.
  • Dependency Management
    When used in a Java environment, managing dependencies can become cumbersome, particularly if there are version conflicts with other libraries in the project.
  • Requires Java Runtime
    MockServer requires a Java Runtime Environment, which can be a limitation if your development environment or CI/CD pipeline does not support Java.
  • Limited Community Support
    While it has good official documentation, the community support around MockServer is not as extensive as some other tools, which may limit the availability of third-party plugins and extensions.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UseWebhook and MockServer)

UseWebhook

MockServer

Developer Tools
15 15%
Developer Tools
85% 85
API Tools
0 0%
API Tools
100% 100
Webhooks
100 100%
Webhooks
0% 0
APIs
3 3%
APIs
97% 97

User comments

Share your experience with using UseWebhook and MockServer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MockServer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UseWebhook mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of UseWebhook yet. Tracking of UseWebhook recommendations started around Feb 2025.

MockServer mentions (4)

  • MockServer: Easy mocking of any system you integrate (HTTP or HTTPS)
    There are several strategies to solve this kind of challenge, but today we will see MockServer as a tool to resolve it. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Please recommend a good API Mocking tool
    The open-source examples are mockoon, mock-server.com, etc. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Testing with MockServer
    I've just found out MockServer and it looks awesome 🤩 so I wanted to check it out repeating the steps of my previous demo WireMock Testing which (as you can expect) uses WireMock, another fantastic tool to mock APIs. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • How to unit test successful Oauth requests of 3rd party API's?
    I tend to use MockServer. With MockServer you can define inputs, so you can say that the request should look like this with that URL, etc etc. That way you can verify that the request looks okay. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UseWebhook and MockServer, you can also consider the following products

Webhook.site - Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.

Webhooks.io - Webhook management and delivery platform that manages all the technical details from scaling the delivery infrastructure for web callbacks.

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

Hookdeck - Hookdeck makes it simple to build and deploy reliable, testable, and debuggable applications that rely on webhooks.

Request inspector - Debug web hooks, http clients

Polipo - A small and fast caching web proxy (a web cache, an HTTP proxy, a proxy server).

Loading...