Usetiful VS Babel

Usetiful Reviews

1. Marek Albrecht    

   Portal Admin at LARP Slovakia | about 4 years ago
   Convenient and free

   It was easy to get started - I have registered the free plan and created the first tour in approximately 15 minutes. Since then I have been improving on the experience.

   Part of my application is a single-page app. It was quite techy to get this part running. Kudos for the customer support that walked me through!

   🏁 Competitors: WalkMe

   👍 Pros:    Free basic plan|Easy to use|Great customer support

   👎 Cons:    Single page app support
2. Martin Novak    

   Front end manager at Netwits Company | about 4 years ago
   A nice simple tool for user onboarding

   I use Usetiful for various clients' projects that require product tours. Everyone was satisfied so far. Web editor allows me to quickly update the content and browser extension to preview the tours. Reports provide enough detail.

   🏁 Competitors: Appcues

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Easy user interface|Preview function|Good price

   👎 Cons:    Nothing, so far

Babel Reviews

Usetiful mentions (0)

Babel mentions (134)

• How, and why, you should add JavaScript linting to your project. With ESLint and Gulp

  Some of the most popular JavaScript linting tools are ESLint, JSHint, JSLint and JSCS. We're going to be using ESLint. It’s very flexible, easy to use and has the best ES6 support, which will be helpful if we introduce more modern JavaScript (that will be transpiled for older browsers using https://babeljs.io/). All rules for ESLint can be found here: https://eslint.org/docs/rules/. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• What is Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG)?

  This simply extends the existing build process that many front-end frameworks have. After Babel's done with its transpilation, it merely executes code to compile your initial screen into static HTML and CSS. This isn't entirely dissimilar from how SSR hydrates your initial screen, but it's done at compile-time, not at request time. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Storybook 8 Beta

  First, we switched the default compiler for new projects from Babel to SWC (Speedy Web Compiler). SWC is dramatically faster than Babel and requires zero configuration. We’ll continue to support Babel in any project currently using it. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Nuxt vs Next: Which JavaScript Framework Suits Your Next Project?

  Nuxt.js is an open-source JavaScript framework built on Vue.js, Node.js, Vite, and Babel.js used for creating fast, cutting-edge applications. Nuxt.js possesses similar features to Next.js, with the major difference being the web framework it is compatible with. Next.js is a React framework whereas Nuxt.js is a Vue framework. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Abstract Syntax Trees and Practical Applications in JavaScript

  Disclaimer: If you've already developed Babel or ESLint plugins, this article may not be as beneficial for you, as you're likely already familiar with the majority of the content covered here. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago