Userify VS SSL.com

That's exactly how Userify[0] used to work. (when it was Python; now that it's a Go app, we do the caching in memory using Ristretto[1]). 0. https://userify.com (team ssh key management/sudo authz) 1. https://github.com/dgraph-io/ristretto. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

> A better law would be to forbid "free" offerings by companies. They all are fraudulent "free", since you pay a commercial entity with either money or data. And, corporate "free" rarely stays free. When we first launched Userify[1], it was completely free. After a while, we realized that was kind of a dumb decision and decided to charge, and we lost zero customers. (We decided to only charge if you actually were... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

I am the CEO of a small startup named Userify (shameless plug: https://userify.com, innovative SSH key management, self-hosted and saas) and when we launched, a few mentions on Hacker News really kicked things off. Ten years and tons of adventures later, we've hit a bit of a growth wall. It seems like we're still valuable and useful to people and people still like to run their own servers/instances, so it seems... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

Of course. A screenshot can explain the product and how it works at a glance. One screenshot is worth 1,000 white papers. ;) For example, Userify (https://userify.com, cross-cloud ssh key management for teams, with a nifty color-coded dashboard so you can actually see who has what access) doesn't seem to have any screenshots anywhere. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

Maybe it's a concern about screenshots not matching current versions of the product, but that shouldn't be a concern on the main product page or home page. For example, Userify (https://userify.com, cross-platform ssh key management for teams, with a nifty color-coded dashboard so you can actually see who has what access) doesn't even have any screenshots anywhere, and definitely not on their main page. A... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

I currently use ssl.com for a SMIME certificate which works. Emails sent to gmail for example will show the email as signed/trusted even if it's not encrypted. Source: 6 months ago

It looks like they resell ssl.com and for onion there is appendix B in CA/B BR is for handling a certificate for .onion addresses. https://www.harica.gr/ sells cert for onion too. Source: 11 months ago

I have succeeded in getting the code signing done in the Windows environment. I bought an EV cert online went through the process of signing the Mesh agent files. All is working well. However, I am finding that Apple has its own code signing process and doesn't use these outside providers like ssl.com and others. Source: about 1 year ago

Hey shipmates, so I'm trying to enroll in the FMF Academy so I can earn my FMF Pin, but I can only do so by registering online with my government email. That being said, I'm able to see some of my emails like from the NOSC and such, but I cannot see emails from NAVNETWARCOM, because of S/MIME. Do I have to get onto the SSL.com website and get a S/MIME from that website, so I can finally enroll in the online FMF... Source: about 2 years ago

See my edit. I am switching to https://ssl.com, which has no rate limiting in place. Problem solved! Source: about 2 years ago