UseGravity.App
SaaS Boilerplate
MERNKIT
Divjoy
Nextless.js
supastarter
mvpbase
Serverless.page
WebComponents.dev
Arbiter IDE
Deco IDE
CodeOnline
unscan
Minze.dev
Vite
WebTestIt
Gravity is a SaaS boilerplate for Node.js & React that enables developers to spin up a new SaaS product in 5 minutes, instead of 5 months.
Save time and money by deploying common SaaS features in minutes, freeing up time and resources to develop value-driven features that customers will pay for.
Gravity contains every SaaS feature you need in a single install:
UseGravity.App WebComponents.devNo WebComponents.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, UseGravity.App should be more popular than WebComponents.dev. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Gravity is a fullstack javascript SaaS starter kit built with Node.js and React.js. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
What is your main advantage over https://usegravity.app/? - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Is this a monorepo setup? It looks like one from the graphics. I also think when it comes to these SaaS starter kits its helpful to have visuals of the out of the box look and feel. I would also recommend creating a docs page. For example I've used this a few times https://usegravity.app/ and the thing that sold me on it is the Docs, it gives the feeling that its very robust. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Does anyone have experience using the Gravity SaaS boilerplate (https://usegravity.app/) ? Our team is currently evaluating it for an internal expansion project, and we want to assess its entire code base before making the actual purchase. Source: about 2 years ago
Your landing page, messaging, plans and pricing looks like a mix-match of content lifted from other SaaS boilerplates on the market including mine (https://usegravity.app). Source: over 2 years ago
How the tag name gets into your code can vary based on the method you are using to write your components. If you load up a few of the templates over on WebComponents.dev you'll see that many examples just use a string value typed into the define function directly. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
WebComponents.dev — In-browser IDE to code web components in isolation with 58 templates available, supporting stories and tests. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
We will show the benefits of Atomico through a comparison, we have used as a basis for this comparison the existing counter webcomponents in webcomponents.dev of Atomico, Lit, Preact and React as a base. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Unfortunately, I couldn't get this to work in the online LWC editor https://webcomponents.dev So assuming this also won't work in the shadow DOM enviroment of SF? Source: almost 3 years ago
WebComponentsDev have a lot of libraries and info (like codesandbox, but webcomponents land): Https://webcomponents.dev/. Source: about 3 years ago
SaaS Boilerplate - Launch a SaaS business faster with this boilerplate app
Arbiter IDE - The offline-friendly, in-browser IDE for pure JS prototypes
MERNKIT - SaaS Boilerplate for MERN Stack - MongoDB, Node.js, React.js - Stripe, Authentication, User Management, Beautiful UI - Focus on features!
Deco IDE - Best IDE for building React Native apps
Divjoy - The React codebase generator.
CodeOnline - A remote and secure workspace powered by VSCode
