Which is odd, usually places actually post the response not just that someone refused. Does that mean it just didn't respond? It's really just pinknews and a weird usatoday.news site instead of the real usatoday.com site where I can find this after searching, and some twitter users linking it. Source: over 1 year ago

John Mueller from Google said they are. There was a Search Engine Journal article where he said they are able to catch most of them and make them not worth anything. We have tried web 2.0 vs standard link building and we noticed that Google does devalue a lot of web 2.0 links. We had a site with 1000 links and another with 13000 in the same niche but the 13000 was web 2.0 and the site with 1000 ranks higher on... Source: over 1 year ago

No source from usatoday.com actually proves any of this.... Nothing has been updated since she assumed office in 2019. This sub blows my mind. You all talk about how stupid any other sub is but just chew on and push anything that fits you. I can stop shaking my head at both sides and the amount of bullshit everyone just takes as facts. Source: almost 2 years ago

App / URL: cnn.com, msn.com, usatoday.com (just these three to test, blocking obvious sections games, esports, mail, sports, etc). Source: about 2 years ago

Hi everyone: That’s all I have time to answer today. Thank you for all the questions. Keep following our coverage at usatoday.com and email me with tips, questions etc at jmeyer@usatoday.com. Source: about 2 years ago

What's the relation between the Gitlab repository and the Github one? https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

Sorry guys.. should've realized this was paywalled. I have the Bypass Paywalls plugin on my browser. Source: 6 months ago

Edit: Here's a good paywall blocker I use. Mobile users in shambles. Source: 6 months ago

FWIW I am happy that magnolia1234 forked iamadamdev's repo. I wanted to report that barrons.com is not working with the original repo (https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome was giving the following notice. An owner of this repository has limited the ability to open an issue to users that have contributed to this repository in the past. barrons.com worked out of the box with the new repo... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

What a weird, overly-confrontational message from the fork's author! No need to call someone publishing work for free lazy, ignorant, not the sharpest tool in the shed etc. Plus, the original repository isn't even licensed https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome . So magnolia1234 probably forked it illegally after copying the name... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago