Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Uptime Kuma VS Charles Proxy

Compare Uptime Kuma VS Charles Proxy and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX
The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Uptime Kuma logo Uptime Kuma

A fancy self-hosted monitoring tool.

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy
  • Uptime Kuma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

Uptime Kuma features and specs

  • Open Source
    Being open-source means the source code is freely available for anyone to inspect, modify, and enhance, promoting transparency and community-driven development.
  • Self-Hosted
    Allows you to host the application on your own server, providing complete control over your data and infrastructure.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Offers a clean and intuitive UI, making it easy for users to set up and manage uptime monitoring.
  • Customizable Notifications
    Supports multiple notification channels (e.g., email, Slack, Telegram) and allows customizable alert settings.
  • Multiple Monitoring Types
    Supports various types of monitoring including HTTP(s), TCP, and ICMP (ping), allowing for versatile use cases.
  • Resource Efficient
    Designed to be lightweight, ensuring it does not consume significant system resources.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Provides support for multiple languages, making it accessible to a broader audience worldwide.
  • Community Support
    Being part of a vibrant open-source community means you can get help and contribute to the project, which often results in rapid bug fixes and feature enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of Uptime Kuma

  • Self-Maintenance
    Requires the user to handle all aspects of server maintenance, including updates, backups, and security patches.
  • Limited Features Compared to Paid Solutions
    May lack some advanced features and integrations offered by commercial uptime monitoring services.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Can be complex to set up, especially for users who are not familiar with self-hosted solutions or lack technical expertise.
  • No Official Support
    Lacks official customer support, meaning users primarily rely on community help and forums for troubleshooting.
  • Scalability Issues
    May face scalability challenges when monitoring a large number of endpoints, requiring additional configuration and resources.
  • Dependency Management
    Requires careful management of dependencies and updates to ensure stability and compatibility, which may be time-consuming.

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

Analysis of Uptime Kuma

Overall verdict

  • Uptime Kuma is considered a good option for those who need a reliable, customizable monitoring solution that they can self-host. It is especially valued by users who appreciate its open-source nature, ease of setup, and the ability to adapt to diverse monitoring needs without incurring costs.

Why this product is good

  • Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted monitoring tool that is praised for its user-friendly interface, robust functionality, and flexibility. It allows users to monitor the uptime status of their websites, services, and other resources in a straightforward manner. The tool supports notifications through several channels, custom dashboards, and has an active community that continuously contributes to its improvement. It's open-source, which means it's transparent and subject to input from developers worldwide.

Recommended for

    Uptime Kuma is recommended for small to medium-sized businesses, developers, system administrators, and hobbyists who need an easy-to-use, self-managed monitoring tool. It's ideal for those who require a no-cost solution and have some level of technical proficiency to set up and maintain their own server environment.

Analysis of Charles Proxy

Overall verdict

  • Charles Proxy is considered an excellent tool for those who need to monitor and analyze network communications. Its rich set of features and ease of use make it a valuable asset for developers and testers.

Why this product is good

  • Charles Proxy is widely regarded as a robust and versatile tool for web developers, offering comprehensive features for HTTP/HTTPS debugging, web traffic analysis, and SSL proxying. It provides a user-friendly interface, supports a wide array of platforms, and is especially useful for troubleshooting network issues and optimizing network calls.

Recommended for

  • Web Developers
  • Mobile App Developers
  • Network Engineers
  • QA Testers
  • Technical Support Teams

Uptime Kuma videos

+ Add

Meet Uptime Kuma, a Fancy Open Source Uptime Monitor for all your HomeLab Monitoring Needs

More videos:

  • Review - Like A Pro Service Monitoring with Uptime Kuma for Home Assistant
  • Review - Monitor Status with Uptime Kuma - Let's install Uptime Kuma with Docker
  • Review - Uptime Kuma Open Source Uptime Monitor for HomeLab Server monitoring

Charles Proxy videos

No Charles Proxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Uptime Kuma and Charles Proxy)

Uptime Kuma

Charles Proxy

Website Monitoring
100 100%
Website Monitoring
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
Proxy
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Uptime Kuma and Charles Proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Uptime Kuma and Charles Proxy

Uptime Kuma Reviews

Self Hosting Like Its 2025
Dockge is relatively new and created by the developer behind Uptime Kuma, which is a fantastic tool. Although it hasn’t yet reached the maturity of Portainer, Dockge truly excels in its simplicity. It’s also regularly updated, and the developer is prompt in addressing issues on GitHub.
Source: kiranet.org

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
Source: www.bestproxyreviews.com
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Uptime Kuma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 102 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Uptime Kuma mentions (102)

View more

Charles Proxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Charles Proxy yet. Tracking of Charles Proxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Uptime Kuma and Charles Proxy, you can also consider the following products

UptimeRobot - Free Website Uptime Monitoring

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

Pingdom - With website monitoring from Pingdom you will be the first to know when your website is down. No installation required. 30-day free trial.

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Uptime.com - Everything you require for availability monitoring. Simple & intuitive industry leading Enterprise-grade features delivered at a fair price, that are continuously improving.

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

Loading...