Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Uptime Kuma VS CFR

Compare Uptime Kuma VS CFR and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Uptime Kuma logo Uptime Kuma

A fancy self-hosted monitoring tool.

CFR logo CFR

CFR is a JVM bytecode decompiler - it will decompile modern Java features - up to and including much of Java 9, but is written entirely in Java 6, so will work anywhere! - It'll even make a decent go of turning class files from other JVM languages (…
  • Uptime Kuma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • CFR Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-09

Uptime Kuma features and specs

  • Open Source
    Being open-source means the source code is freely available for anyone to inspect, modify, and enhance, promoting transparency and community-driven development.
  • Self-Hosted
    Allows you to host the application on your own server, providing complete control over your data and infrastructure.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Offers a clean and intuitive UI, making it easy for users to set up and manage uptime monitoring.
  • Customizable Notifications
    Supports multiple notification channels (e.g., email, Slack, Telegram) and allows customizable alert settings.
  • Multiple Monitoring Types
    Supports various types of monitoring including HTTP(s), TCP, and ICMP (ping), allowing for versatile use cases.
  • Resource Efficient
    Designed to be lightweight, ensuring it does not consume significant system resources.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Provides support for multiple languages, making it accessible to a broader audience worldwide.
  • Community Support
    Being part of a vibrant open-source community means you can get help and contribute to the project, which often results in rapid bug fixes and feature enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of Uptime Kuma

  • Self-Maintenance
    Requires the user to handle all aspects of server maintenance, including updates, backups, and security patches.
  • Limited Features Compared to Paid Solutions
    May lack some advanced features and integrations offered by commercial uptime monitoring services.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Can be complex to set up, especially for users who are not familiar with self-hosted solutions or lack technical expertise.
  • No Official Support
    Lacks official customer support, meaning users primarily rely on community help and forums for troubleshooting.
  • Scalability Issues
    May face scalability challenges when monitoring a large number of endpoints, requiring additional configuration and resources.
  • Dependency Management
    Requires careful management of dependencies and updates to ensure stability and compatibility, which may be time-consuming.

CFR features and specs

  • Efficiency
    CFR allows users to quickly re-encode files, optimizing the time and resources needed for conversion processes.
  • Compatibility
    It supports a variety of input formats making it a versatile tool for different file conversion needs.
  • User-Friendly
    The interface is simple and intuitive, making it accessible even for users with minimal technical expertise.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, CFR provides transparency and the ability for developers to contribute to its enhancement and troubleshoot issues.

Possible disadvantages of CFR

  • Limited Advanced Features
    CFR might lack some advanced features and customization options found in more robust commercial conversion software.
  • Performance Limitations
    For large-scale conversion tasks, CFR may not perform as efficiently as higher-end paid solutions, potentially leading to longer processing times.
  • Support
    Since it's an open-source project, dedicated customer support is limited compared to commercial software solutions, which may impact troubleshooting.

Analysis of Uptime Kuma

Overall verdict

  • Uptime Kuma is considered a good option for those who need a reliable, customizable monitoring solution that they can self-host. It is especially valued by users who appreciate its open-source nature, ease of setup, and the ability to adapt to diverse monitoring needs without incurring costs.

Why this product is good

  • Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted monitoring tool that is praised for its user-friendly interface, robust functionality, and flexibility. It allows users to monitor the uptime status of their websites, services, and other resources in a straightforward manner. The tool supports notifications through several channels, custom dashboards, and has an active community that continuously contributes to its improvement. It's open-source, which means it's transparent and subject to input from developers worldwide.

Recommended for

    Uptime Kuma is recommended for small to medium-sized businesses, developers, system administrators, and hobbyists who need an easy-to-use, self-managed monitoring tool. It's ideal for those who require a no-cost solution and have some level of technical proficiency to set up and maintain their own server environment.

Uptime Kuma videos

Meet Uptime Kuma, a Fancy Open Source Uptime Monitor for all your HomeLab Monitoring Needs

More videos:

  • Review - Like A Pro Service Monitoring with Uptime Kuma for Home Assistant
  • Review - Monitor Status with Uptime Kuma - Let's install Uptime Kuma with Docker
  • Review - Uptime Kuma Open Source Uptime Monitor for HomeLab Server monitoring

CFR videos

LONG TERM TEST: CANYON STRIVE CFR 9.0 TEAM

More videos:

  • Review - Elite Force M4 CFR - Combat Field Rifle Review
  • Review - Elite Force M4 CFR Review!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Uptime Kuma and CFR)
Website Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Decompiler
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Uptime Kuma and CFR. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Uptime Kuma and CFR

Uptime Kuma Reviews

Self Hosting Like Its 2025
Dockge is relatively new and created by the developer behind Uptime Kuma, which is a fantastic tool. Although it hasn’t yet reached the maturity of Portainer, Dockge truly excels in its simplicity. It’s also regularly updated, and the developer is prompt in addressing issues on GitHub.
Source: kiranet.org

CFR Reviews

We have no reviews of CFR yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Uptime Kuma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 102 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Uptime Kuma mentions (102)

View more

CFR mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CFR yet. Tracking of CFR recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Uptime Kuma and CFR, you can also consider the following products

UptimeRobot - Free Website Uptime Monitoring

Decompiler.com - Online Java and Android decompiler. Just drag and drop .JAR or .APK file and browse decompiled content online.

Pingdom - With website monitoring from Pingdom you will be the first to know when your website is down. No installation required. 30-day free trial.

Java Decompiler - Yet another fast Java decompiler

Uptime.com - Everything you require for availability monitoring. Simple & intuitive industry leading Enterprise-grade features delivered at a fair price, that are continuously improving.

Java Class File Editor - classeditor - tool to edit class file binaries