Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Uptime Kuma VS Apache HTTP Server

Compare Uptime Kuma VS Apache HTTP Server and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Uptime Kuma logo Uptime Kuma

A fancy self-hosted monitoring tool.

Apache HTTP Server logo Apache HTTP Server

Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996
  • Uptime Kuma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • Apache HTTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21

Uptime Kuma features and specs

  • Open Source
    Being open-source means the source code is freely available for anyone to inspect, modify, and enhance, promoting transparency and community-driven development.
  • Self-Hosted
    Allows you to host the application on your own server, providing complete control over your data and infrastructure.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Offers a clean and intuitive UI, making it easy for users to set up and manage uptime monitoring.
  • Customizable Notifications
    Supports multiple notification channels (e.g., email, Slack, Telegram) and allows customizable alert settings.
  • Multiple Monitoring Types
    Supports various types of monitoring including HTTP(s), TCP, and ICMP (ping), allowing for versatile use cases.
  • Resource Efficient
    Designed to be lightweight, ensuring it does not consume significant system resources.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Provides support for multiple languages, making it accessible to a broader audience worldwide.
  • Community Support
    Being part of a vibrant open-source community means you can get help and contribute to the project, which often results in rapid bug fixes and feature enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of Uptime Kuma

  • Self-Maintenance
    Requires the user to handle all aspects of server maintenance, including updates, backups, and security patches.
  • Limited Features Compared to Paid Solutions
    May lack some advanced features and integrations offered by commercial uptime monitoring services.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Can be complex to set up, especially for users who are not familiar with self-hosted solutions or lack technical expertise.
  • No Official Support
    Lacks official customer support, meaning users primarily rely on community help and forums for troubleshooting.
  • Scalability Issues
    May face scalability challenges when monitoring a large number of endpoints, requiring additional configuration and resources.
  • Dependency Management
    Requires careful management of dependencies and updates to ensure stability and compatibility, which may be time-consuming.

Apache HTTP Server features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache HTTP Server is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This promotes a large, active community that contributes to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Cross-Platform
    Apache is compatible with a variety of operating systems, including Unix, Linux, and Windows, providing flexibility and widespread usability.
  • Highly Customizable
    It offers a modular architecture that allows users to enable or disable features as needed, and to extend functionality through modules.
  • Robust Documentation
    Apache provides comprehensive and detailed documentation, which makes it easier for users to install, configure, and troubleshoot the server.
  • Widespread Adoption
    With its long history and widespread use, Apache has proven to be reliable and trusted by many organizations worldwide, ensuring a level of trust and stability.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Apache includes many features out-of-the-box, such as SSL/TLS support, URL redirection, authentication, load balancing, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HTTP Server

  • Performance Overhead
    Compared to some lightweight web servers like Nginx, Apache can have higher memory and CPU usage, which may not be ideal for high concurrency needs.
  • Complex Configuration
    Apache's extensive customization options can lead to a complex configuration process, which may be challenging for beginners or those without specific expertise.
  • Less Efficient in Serving Static Content
    While Apache is highly capable, it may be less efficient at serving static content compared to specialized web servers like Nginx.
  • Initial Learning Curve
    Due to its rich features and configurability, new users might face a steep learning curve when first setting up and using Apache HTTP Server.
  • Module Compatibility Issues
    Sometimes, third-party modules may not always be compatible with the latest versions of Apache, causing potential integration issues.

Uptime Kuma videos

Meet Uptime Kuma, a Fancy Open Source Uptime Monitor for all your HomeLab Monitoring Needs

More videos:

  • Review - Like A Pro Service Monitoring with Uptime Kuma for Home Assistant
  • Review - Monitor Status with Uptime Kuma - Let's install Uptime Kuma with Docker
  • Review - Uptime Kuma Open Source Uptime Monitor for HomeLab Server monitoring

Apache HTTP Server videos

No Apache HTTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Uptime Kuma and Apache HTTP Server)
Website Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Uptime Kuma and Apache HTTP Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Uptime Kuma and Apache HTTP Server

Uptime Kuma Reviews

Self Hosting Like Its 2025
Dockge is relatively new and created by the developer behind Uptime Kuma, which is a fantastic tool. Although it hasn’t yet reached the maturity of Portainer, Dockge truly excels in its simplicity. It’s also regularly updated, and the developer is prompt in addressing issues on GitHub.
Source: kiranet.org

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server
However, compared to XAMPP and other popular web servers in the market Apache HTTP Server is a bit more complicated and is a little difficult to navigate for a complete newbie, but if you want to understand web development from the very fundamentals and understand how Apache as a web server software works then this software can be of great help to you.
Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
The most commonly used Web Server is by far Apache HTTP Server from the Software Apache Foundation. Created in 1995 by Rob McCool and Brian Behlendorf, among others. The name is a pun for A PatCHy server, as at the time of it’s inception, Apache was based on some existing code, along with some perhaps “hacky or clunky” software packages, enabling it to run. Additionally, the...
Source: chemicloud.com
10 Best alternatives of XAMPP servers for Windows, Linux and macOS
Apache is an open-source and free web server software that owns about 46% of websites worldwide. The official name is Apache HTTP Server and is maintained and developed by the Apache Software Foundation. This allows website owners to serve content on the web – hence the name “webserver”.
Top 5 open source web servers
As the Apache HTTP Server has been the most popular web server since 1996, it "benefits from great documentation and integrated support from other software projects." You can find more information on the Apache Foundation project page.
Source: opensource.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Uptime Kuma might be a bit more popular than Apache HTTP Server. We know about 102 links to it since March 2021 and only 69 links to Apache HTTP Server. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Uptime Kuma mentions (102)

View more

Apache HTTP Server mentions (69)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Uptime Kuma and Apache HTTP Server, you can also consider the following products

UptimeRobot - Free Website Uptime Monitoring

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Pingdom - With website monitoring from Pingdom you will be the first to know when your website is down. No installation required. 30-day free trial.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Uptime.com - Everything you require for availability monitoring. Simple & intuitive industry leading Enterprise-grade features delivered at a fair price, that are continuously improving.

XAMPP - XAMPP is a free and open-source cross-platform web server that is primarily used when locally developing web applications.