uProxy VS Private Packagist

uProxy mentions (0)

Private Packagist mentions (7)

• Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?

  I was told in another forum to look at Private Packagist... But how is that different? Instead of installing packages from packagist.org.. You pay to Packagist.com to do the same thing? You just download from packagist.com cloud instead of packagist.org? Source: over 1 year ago

• Need a secured way to be able to use Composer

  We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Need a secured way to be able to use Composer

  Https://packagist.com maybe tell them about a local packagist install. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Need a secured way to be able to use Composer

  "[MANAGER] requested this to be done in PHP. You as IT will know that most modern programming and scripting languages work only with packaging software properly. Composer sends requests (majority of cases) to packagist.com and to github.com. It will add thousands of hours to do everything that composer does manually. Please sign here to authorize the usage of 4000 hours and the possible delay of 4000 hours.... Source: almost 2 years ago

• What do you think of SaaS Frameworks?

  Another downside that only really exists with non-PHP boilerplates is getting updates isn'T as easy. With PHP we're able to use packagist.com and make our code available via composer. Other languages don't have this so SaaS Pegasus provides zip downloads and Gravity provides access to a GitHub repo. This means you have to apply bug fixes yourself. With Parthenon, you do composer update and you'll get the latest... Source: almost 2 years ago