Update Manager VS bauh

Compare Update Manager VS bauh and see what are their differences

B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready! Authentication - SAML/OIDC SSO, Directory Sync (SCIM 2.0), Audit Logs, Data Privacy Vault, and more! featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

bauh (ba-oo), formerly known as fpakman, is a graphical interface for managing your Linux software (packages/applications). It currently supports the following formats: AppImage, ArchLinux repositories/AUR, Flatpak, Snap and Web applications.

Landing page //
2023-10-23

Landing page //
2023-10-07

Overview of the Update Manager Interface in the vSphere Client

bauh videos

+ Add

Review Bauh semangka 🍉 || Kebun Buah Segar

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Update Manager and bauh)

Update Manager

bauh

Software Marketplace

59 59%

Software Marketplace

41% 41

Front End Package Manager

0 0%

Front End Package Manager

100% 100

OS & Utilities

100 100%

OS & Utilities

0% 0

Code Collaboration

65 65%

Code Collaboration

35% 35

User comments

Share your experience with using Update Manager and bauh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bauh should be more popular than Update Manager. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Update Manager mentions (2)

Can someone help me with this? i'm new to linux and idk if i should worry about this.
I think someone (not me; I do this too much) should file a bug report about this - here. I note that there is a corresponding message when use uses apt (or apt-get) in the terminal, except that, in the terminal, the message is tagged as a warning, whereas here it is tagged as an error - which makes the situation more serious. Source: over 1 year ago
Backporting mintupdate
I don't think the Mint team has said. All that the team has said, to my knowledge, is that some of the 20.2 update will be backported. One thing you could do to try to answer your question is to keep an eye upon the relevant repository. Source: almost 3 years ago

bauh mentions (12)

Imade a simple shell script program to manage packages in Linux. Currently it supports apt, flatpak, snap. It can probably be useful for someone.
Like bauh which supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. Source: 10 months ago
Problems installing many apps
If you really want a GUI package manager that doesn't break EndeavourOS, I've had a good experience with bauh when I started using EOS. But I also do everything with yay now, as others have suggested, it is more convenient once you know the commands. Source: over 1 year ago
Name a program that doesn't get enough love!
Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists. Source: over 1 year ago
BalenaEtcher appimage is not clickable?
Is it an AppImage? Did you make it executable? If you use a lot of AppImages then you may want to add DE integration via their utility. I do not use it, as it runs a backgroudn daemon, I prefer using bauh instead. Source: over 1 year ago
Boutique: a Flatpak app store (alpha) feedbacks are welcome
You can use bauh. Supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. GitHub. Source: almost 2 years ago