Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Unused CSS finder VS Grafbase

Compare Unused CSS finder VS Grafbase and see what are their differences

Unused CSS finder logo Unused CSS finder

Crawl your website and find unused CSS

Grafbase logo Grafbase

Unify the data layer with GraphQL
  • Unused CSS finder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-27
  • Grafbase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

Unused CSS finder features and specs

  • Efficiency
    Identifies unused CSS, resulting in cleaner and more efficient code. This can lead to improved page load times and reduced bandwidth usage.
  • Ease of Use
    Provides a straightforward interface that allows users to quickly scan their websites and find unnecessary CSS without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Cost Savings
    By eliminating unused CSS, it reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted and stored, potentially saving on hosting and bandwidth costs.
  • Improved Maintenance
    With a reduction in CSS file size, future maintenance becomes easier and more manageable, making it simpler to update or refactor code.

Possible disadvantages of Unused CSS finder

  • False Positives
    May incorrectly identify CSS as unused if the tool does not recognize dynamic changes or conditional loading, which can lead to accidental removal of necessary styles.
  • Dependency on External Tool
    Relying on an external tool could present privacy and security concerns, especially when sharing potentially sensitive code and styling information.
  • Manual Verification
    Requires manual verification of results to ensure important styles are not removed, which can be time-consuming and somewhat negate the tool's time savings.
  • Incompatibility with Complex Frameworks
    Might not effectively handle complex CSS frameworks or preprocessors, where styles are used indirectly or dynamically through Javascript or server-side frameworks.

Grafbase features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Unused CSS finder and Grafbase)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
GraphQL
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
66 66%
34% 34
CSS Framework
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Unused CSS finder and Grafbase. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Grafbase seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Unused CSS finder mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Unused CSS finder yet. Tracking of Unused CSS finder recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Grafbase mentions (1)

  • Why I love Rust for tokenising and parsing
    > If you don't mind me asking, which companies? Or how do you get into this industry within an industry? I'd really love to work on some programming language implementations professionally (although maybe that's just because I've built them non-professionally until now), You do not need to write programming languages to need parsers and lexers. My last company was Prisma (https://prisma.io) where we had our own... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Unused CSS finder and Grafbase, you can also consider the following products

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

GraphQL Hive - Open Source GraphQL Federation Platform

Purgecss - Easily remove unused CSS

Hasura - Hasura is an open platform to build scalable app backends, offering a built-in database, search, user-management and more.

CSSViewer - A simple CSS property viewer

Apollo Engine - Unlock the full power of GraphQL