Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Unused CSS finder VS BrowserCat

Compare Unused CSS finder VS BrowserCat and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Unused CSS finder logo Unused CSS finder

Crawl your website and find unused CSS

BrowserCat logo BrowserCat

Easy, fast, and reliable browser automation and headless browser APIs. The web is messy, but your code shouldn't be.
  • Unused CSS finder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-27
  • BrowserCat Home Page
    Home Page //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Metrics Dashboard
    Metrics Dashboard //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Easy Setup
    Easy Setup //
    2023-12-21

Finally, you can develop browser automation without the pain and the cost of deploying a fleet of headless browsers. Connect to BrowserCat, scale globally, and pay only for what you use. Scrape the web, automate your workflows, test your apps, generate beautiful images and pdfs from HTML, give you AI agent web access, and more.

Get started in minutes. Our forever-free plan gives you 1,000 free requests per month.

BrowserCat

$ Details
freemium $10.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Web REST API Google Chrome Firefox Safari

Unused CSS finder features and specs

  • Efficiency
    Identifies unused CSS, resulting in cleaner and more efficient code. This can lead to improved page load times and reduced bandwidth usage.
  • Ease of Use
    Provides a straightforward interface that allows users to quickly scan their websites and find unnecessary CSS without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Cost Savings
    By eliminating unused CSS, it reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted and stored, potentially saving on hosting and bandwidth costs.
  • Improved Maintenance
    With a reduction in CSS file size, future maintenance becomes easier and more manageable, making it simpler to update or refactor code.

Possible disadvantages of Unused CSS finder

  • False Positives
    May incorrectly identify CSS as unused if the tool does not recognize dynamic changes or conditional loading, which can lead to accidental removal of necessary styles.
  • Dependency on External Tool
    Relying on an external tool could present privacy and security concerns, especially when sharing potentially sensitive code and styling information.
  • Manual Verification
    Requires manual verification of results to ensure important styles are not removed, which can be time-consuming and somewhat negate the tool's time savings.
  • Incompatibility with Complex Frameworks
    Might not effectively handle complex CSS frameworks or preprocessors, where styles are used indirectly or dynamically through Javascript or server-side frameworks.

BrowserCat features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Unused CSS finder and BrowserCat)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Automation
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Scraping
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Unused CSS finder and BrowserCat.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

BrowserCat's answer:

BrowserCat is built on robust open source technology that's under active development. The star of the show is Playwright, which is our recommended automation library. It's maintained by Microsoft, it officially supports JS, Python, Java, and .NET, and it's fast becoming the industry standard. BrowserCat also supports Puppeteer and numerous unofficial Playwright ports to Go, Rust, PHP, and Ruby.

What makes your product unique?

BrowserCat's answer:

Unlike other headless browser providers, BrowserCat gives you total control over your browser instances for as long as you need them. Leverage the browsers cache, cookies, and storage for bespoke browser automation jobs that truly differentiate your business from the competition.

What's the story behind your product?

BrowserCat's answer:

In previous corporate and startup gigs, I faced the challenge of developing robust, fast, and scalable browser automation. Most APIs in the space are too limiting for our needs and they were often incredibly slow. On the other hand, hosting your own headless browser fleet was a pain. I founded BrowserCat to make scaling up browser automation as easy, reliable, and affordable as deploying a serverless function.

How would you describe your primary audience?

BrowserCat's answer:

We primarily serve developers, whether the seek to develop unique browser automation jobs or radically improve the performance of their integration tests. However, we frequently work with management, biz ops, and product leaders to solve problems they can't solve any way but through automation.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

BrowserCat's answer:

BrowserCat is built for performance, scalability, stability, and affordability using modern web technologies. Many of our competitors were early to market and compete on entrenchment rather than functionality. Still others are bound by their existing users to continue supporting legacy tech, rather than embrace improved, modern standards. BrowserCat is focused on supporting your for the next ten years, rather than the past ten years.

User comments

Share your experience with using Unused CSS finder and BrowserCat. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Unused CSS finder and BrowserCat, you can also consider the following products

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

Microlink - Extract structured data from any website

Purgecss - Easily remove unused CSS

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

CSSViewer - A simple CSS property viewer

Scrapy - Scrapy | A Fast and Powerful Scraping and Web Crawling Framework