Unused CSS finder VS Balsamiq

Compare Unused CSS finder VS Balsamiq and see what are their differences

Kimp

Kimp is an unlimited design company, specializing in graphic design (including print and digital designs, custom illustrations, landing page designs and email designs) and video design. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Balsamiq

Balsamiq. Rapid, effective and fun wireframing software.

Landing page //
2021-09-27

Landing page //
2021-10-02

Unused CSS finder

Website: jitbit.com
Pricing URL: -

Edit details

Balsamiq

Website: balsamiq.com
Pricing URL: Official Balsamiq Pricing

Edit details

Unused CSS finder features and specs

Efficiency
Identifies unused CSS, resulting in cleaner and more efficient code. This can lead to improved page load times and reduced bandwidth usage.
Ease of Use
Provides a straightforward interface that allows users to quickly scan their websites and find unnecessary CSS without needing extensive technical knowledge.
Cost Savings
By eliminating unused CSS, it reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted and stored, potentially saving on hosting and bandwidth costs.
Improved Maintenance
With a reduction in CSS file size, future maintenance becomes easier and more manageable, making it simpler to update or refactor code.

Possible disadvantages of Unused CSS finder

False Positives
May incorrectly identify CSS as unused if the tool does not recognize dynamic changes or conditional loading, which can lead to accidental removal of necessary styles.
Dependency on External Tool
Relying on an external tool could present privacy and security concerns, especially when sharing potentially sensitive code and styling information.
Manual Verification
Requires manual verification of results to ensure important styles are not removed, which can be time-consuming and somewhat negate the tool's time savings.
Incompatibility with Complex Frameworks
Might not effectively handle complex CSS frameworks or preprocessors, where styles are used indirectly or dynamically through Javascript or server-side frameworks.

Balsamiq features and specs

User-Friendly Interface
Balsamiq offers an intuitive, drag-and-drop interface that makes it easy for users of all skill levels to create wireframes quickly.
Rapid Prototyping
The tool is designed for speed, allowing users to iterate and refine designs rapidly, aiding in quick decision-making and revisions.
Low-Fidelity Focus
Balsamiq emphasizes low-fidelity wireframes, making it easier to focus on structure and user flow rather than getting bogged down in details like colors and fonts.
Collaboration Features
It includes collaboration tools such as comments and real-time co-editing, making it easier for teams to work together and share feedback.
Cross-Platform Availability
Balsamiq is available both as a web application and a desktop app for Windows and macOS, providing flexibility in how teams access the tool.
Extensive Library of UI Components
The software comes with a rich library of pre-built UI components, icons, and templates that simplify the design process.
Integration with Other Tools
Balsamiq integrates seamlessly with popular project management and development tools like Jira, Confluence, and Google Drive.

Possible disadvantages of Balsamiq

Limited Customization Options
Due to its focus on low-fidelity wireframes, Balsamiq offers limited options for detailed customization, which might not be sufficient for high-fidelity design needs.
Cost
Unlike some free wireframing tools, Balsamiq requires a subscription, which could be a barrier for small teams or individual users on a tight budget.
Learning Curve for Advanced Features
While the basic features are easy to use, mastering more advanced functionalities might require additional learning and practice.
No Interactive Prototypes
Balsamiq is primarily focused on static wireframes and lacks features for creating interactive, clickable prototypes, which can be a downside for more complex projects.
Performance Issues with Large Projects
Users have reported performance slowdowns when working with very large or complex wireframing projects.
No Mobile App
Unlike some competitors, Balsamiq does not offer a mobile app, which can limit accessibility for users who need to work on the go.

Unused CSS finder videos

No Unused CSS finder videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Balsamiq videos

+ Add

UX Review: Balsamiq.com - Watch a Usability Expert Review Our Site!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Unused CSS finder and Balsamiq)

Balsamiq

Developer Tools

100 100%

Developer Tools

0% 0

Prototyping

0 0%

Prototyping

100% 100

Design Tools

10 10%

Design Tools

90% 90

Development

100 100%

Development

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Unused CSS finder and Balsamiq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Unused CSS finder and Balsamiq

Unused CSS finder Reviews

We have no reviews of Unused CSS finder yet.
Be the first one to post

Balsamiq Reviews

Figma Alternatives: 12 Prototyping and Design Tools in 2024

Balsamiq is a design tool that has been available since 2008. It’s easy to use and even boasts active customer service if you need help. The software is beginner-friendly, so there is no learning curve if you’re a newbie.

Source: mockitt.wondershare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Balsamiq seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Unused CSS finder mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Unused CSS finder yet. Tracking of Unused CSS finder recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Balsamiq mentions (32)

Revenge of the Junior Developer
Usually my own way of working is to use Balsamiq[0] to have a visual prototype to test out flows, Figma|Sketch for the UI specs, then to just code it. Kinda the same when drawing where you just doodle until you have a few workable ideas, iterate of these to judge colors and other things, and then commit to one for the final result. [0]: https://balsamiq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Three important steps before jumping to the code
You can still produce something useful even if you’re not a professional designer. For example, you can use a rapid wireframing tool like Balsamiq (my favorite) or Excalidraw. With such tools, you can sketch an idea quickly without spending time on minor visual details. Or, use a whiteboard or good old pencil and paper. Any sketch is better than nothing. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Tell HN: My Favorite Tools
A few apps that are a joy to use: https://ia.net/writer for writing. https://usecontrast.com/ for checking contrast. https://sipapp.io/ for picking colors. https://nova.app/ for editing code. https://cleanshot.com/ for screenshots. https://getpixelsnap.com/ for measuring elements on screen. https://netnewswire.com/ for reading things via RSS. https://panic.com/transmit/ for file transfers. https://usefathom.com/... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Ask HN: Best UI design courses for hackers?
I think the best practical approach for designing UIs is to download (and buy) Balsamic[0] and use that to design UIs. Cut through the nonsense of colours and pixels in the first instance and just lay things out logically and simply. [0] https://balsamiq.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Build Products that don’t SUCK
Create a low-fidelity mockup or wireframe of your MVP using tools like Balsamiq, Sketch, or Figma. Or use an easier-to-use tool like Uizard, which also has text-to-design capabilities. Source: over 1 year ago