Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

UI Sources VS autoComplete.js

Compare UI Sources VS autoComplete.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

UI Sources logo UI Sources

Mobile design patterns & interaction videos

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.
  • UI Sources Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-04-20

Browse recordings of end to end user journeys from the top grossing apps to reduce iteration cycles, gain insights, identify trends & benchmark against your competitors and industry’s standard.

  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12

UI Sources features and specs

  • Comprehensive Design Resources
    UI Sources offers a wide range of design resources, including screenshots and screen flows from popular apps. This can provide valuable inspiration and insights for designers seeking to understand the latest UI trends and best practices.
  • High-Quality Content
    The platform provides high-quality visuals and detailed breakdowns of app interfaces, making it easier for users to analyze and learn from successful UI patterns.
  • Regular Updates
    UI Sources frequently updates its content with new app interfaces and design patterns, ensuring that users have access to the latest design trends and interfaces.
  • Educational Value
    By showcasing real-world examples of app designs, UI Sources serves as an educational tool for designers looking to enhance their skills or learn new design techniques.

Possible disadvantages of UI Sources

  • Limited Interactivity
    While UI Sources provides detailed visuals, the platform lacks interactive elements that would allow users to engage with the designs more dynamically, which can limit the learning experience.
  • Subscription Cost
    Access to the full range of resources and content provided by UI Sources requires a subscription, which may be a barrier for some users, especially freelancers or small design teams with limited budgets.
  • Niche Focus
    The platform primarily focuses on mobile app interfaces, which might not be as beneficial for designers working on web applications or other types of digital interfaces.
  • Overwhelming for Beginners
    The depth and breadth of information available on UI Sources can be overwhelming for beginner designers who may not yet have the experience to fully utilize and interpret the vast amounts of data provided.

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UI Sources and autoComplete.js)
Design Tools
92 92%
8% 8
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
Custom Search Engine
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using UI Sources and autoComplete.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UI Sources and autoComplete.js, you can also consider the following products

UI Movement - The best UI design inspiration, daily

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

Mobbin - Latest mobile design patterns & elements library

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

Page Flows - User flow design inspiration for mobile & desktop

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C