Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

UI Playbook VS wxWidgets

Compare UI Playbook VS wxWidgets and see what are their differences

LiveSession
LiveSession helps you analyze users’ behavior, improve UX, find JS bugs, and increase conversion rates using session replays, and event-based product analytics. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

UI Playbook logo UI Playbook

The documented collection of UI components

wxWidgets logo wxWidgets

wxWidgets: Cross-Platform GUI Library
  • UI Playbook Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-17
  • wxWidgets Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-21

UI Playbook features and specs

  • Comprehensive Guide
    UI Playbook offers a thorough and well-organized guide on user interface principles, providing valuable insights and best practices for designers at all levels.
  • Accessible Format
    The information is presented in a simple, easy-to-understand format, making it accessible to a wide range of users, from beginners to seasoned professionals.
  • Visual Examples
    The playbook includes visual examples that help in better understanding the implementation of UI concepts, making it easier to grasp complex ideas quickly.
  • Free Resource
    Being a free resource allows anyone to access high-quality information without any financial barrier, which is beneficial for students and novice designers.
  • Community Contribution
    Open to contributions from the community, allowing continuous improvement and updates based on the latest design trends and user feedback.

Possible disadvantages of UI Playbook

  • Limited Depth
    Some users may find the content lacking in depth, as it primarily focuses on basic and intermediate concepts rather than advanced UI design strategies.
  • Technical Limitations
    While the playbook is excellent for visual guidance, it lacks specific technical implementations and code snippets that developers may need.
  • Design Opinion Bias
    The guidance provided might reflect specific design philosophies that do not cater to all styles or industries, potentially limiting its adaptability.
  • Update Frequency
    As a freely accessible tool relying on community updates, it might not always reflect the very latest industry changes as quickly as premium platforms.
  • Navigation Challenges
    Users may find navigating through the large amount of content challenging, especially if they're searching for specific information among multiple sections.

wxWidgets features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    wxWidgets allows developers to create applications that run on different platforms such as Windows, macOS, Linux, and more, without changing the codebase.
  • Native Look and Feel
    It provides a native look and feel on each platform by using the native GUI components, making applications appear more integrated with the host OS.
  • Wide Range of Widgets
    wxWidgets offers a rich set of widgets and controls, supporting complex interfaces and various types of user interactions.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The library is well-documented, with numerous tutorials, guides, and an active community to help developers troubleshoot and expand their understanding.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, wxWidgets provides the flexibility to customize and modify the library to better fit specific needs without licensing costs.

Possible disadvantages of wxWidgets

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and the complexity of configuring UI components, new users may find it challenging to learn and utilize effectively.
  • Large Binary Size
    Applications built with wxWidgets can become quite large, which might be a drawback for developers focusing on lightweight applications.
  • Platform-Specific Bugs
    Since wxWidgets aims to provide native components for each platform, sometimes this leads to platform-specific bugs that can complicate cross-platform consistency.
  • Limited Modern Features
    While wxWidgets is robust, it might lack some of the modern, cutting-edge features found in newer libraries and frameworks in terms of design and ease of use.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies for different platforms can be cumbersome, requiring additional effort in the build and deployment processes.

Analysis of wxWidgets

Overall verdict

  • wxWidgets is a solid choice for developers who need a reliable, cross-platform GUI library with a native look and behavior. Its open-source nature and mature backing make it especially appealing for projects requiring wide platform compatibility.

Why this product is good

  • Platform Independence: wxWidgets allows you to create applications that can run on multiple platforms, such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, without changing the underlying code.
  • Open Source: As an open-source library, wxWidgets is free to use and has a large community supporting it, providing extensive documentation and forums for assistance.
  • Comprehensive Feature Set: wxWidgets provides a wide range of controls and tools that enable developers to build feature-rich applications.
  • Native Look and Feel: The library utilizes the native API of the host system, which means applications built with wxWidgets often look and behave like native applications.
  • Mature and Well-Tested: Having been around for many years, wxWidgets is a mature framework with well-tested tools and a history of stability and reliability.

Recommended for

  • Developers building cross-platform desktop applications.
  • Projects that require native look and feel on different operating systems.
  • Open-source enthusiasts or developers who prefer using community-supported frameworks.
  • Teams seeking a mature and well-documented GUI solution.

UI Playbook videos

+ Add

Vdo UI playbook

wxWidgets videos

+ Add

Cross Platform Graphical User Interfaces in C++

More videos:

  • Demo - More Cross Platform Graphical User Interfaces in C++: Custom Controls

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UI Playbook and wxWidgets)

UI Playbook

wxWidgets

Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
Development Tools
100% 100
Developer Tools
57 57%
Developer Tools
43% 43
Rapid Application Development
0 0%
Rapid Application Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using UI Playbook and wxWidgets. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, wxWidgets seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UI Playbook mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of UI Playbook yet. Tracking of UI Playbook recommendations started around Mar 2021.

wxWidgets mentions (9)

  • Lazarus Release 4.0
    > produce relatively small binaries for simple applications The problem is that you need to have a huge Java runtime installed or use something like Jlink which still produces very large binaries for GUI apps. I think wxWidgets is the Lazarus alternative that is the closest to what grandparent was asking for. https://wxwidgets.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 22 days ago
  • What do you think about using a game engine for UI?
    In general, people must make a choice between portability, and the breadth of optimizations. For multi-platform builds, there are single code-base frameworks available: https://quasar.dev/ For MacOS, Linux Gtk, and Windows native builds there are mature free libraries that allow both FOSS and commercial static linking: https://wxwidgets.org/ Game engines are designed to solve a single set of use-cases for... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Understanding the Layout Process in Qt Widgets
    Why do your prefer it over https://wxwidgets.org given the licenses? Personally, I was keen on Qt right up to the 5.x change over. =3. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Building KiCad 6.0.11 from source - wxWidgets problem
    I decided to compile from scratch the latest wxWidgets from wxwidgets.org. And I compiled and installed successfully for both X11 and GTK. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Tic tac toe ine c++ ?
    Some say qt, others wxwidgets, u++, sfml, here is a video from quick search on wxwidgets and c++ for beginners https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOIbK4bJKS8 Choosethem depending on learning curve and where they will take you, you might learn something harder because it takes you farther to where you want to go. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UI Playbook and wxWidgets, you can also consider the following products

Ant Design System for Figma - A large library of 2100+ handcrafted UI components

Qt - Powerful, flexible and easy to use, Qt will help you not only meet your tight deadline, but also reduce the maintainable code by an astonishing percentage.

UserInterface.io - Weekly UI/UX tips in your inbox for free

GTK - GTK+ is a multi-platform toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces.

DaisyUI - Free UI components plugin for Tailwind CSS

PyQt - Riverbank | Software | PyQt | What is PyQt?

Loading...