Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

uBar VS Flow

Compare uBar VS Flow and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

uBar logo uBar

The Dock replacement for the Mac.

Flow logo Flow

Stop managing projects from your inbox.
  • uBar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-03
  • Flow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-12

uBar features and specs

  • Customization
    uBar allows for extensive customization options for the dock, including position, size, and appearance, which can enhance user experience and productivity.
  • Window Management
    Improved window management through features like app badges, window previews, and app grouping allows for better multitasking and organization.
  • Multiple Monitor Support
    uBar provides robust support for multiple monitors, including the ability to have different settings and preferences for each monitor.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    Offers extensive keyboard shortcuts which can greatly speed up navigation and task execution for power users.
  • Performance
    uBar is generally lightweight and does not consume a significant amount of system resources, thus maintaining the overall performance of the computer.

Possible disadvantages of uBar

  • Cost
    uBar is a paid application, which might be a deterrent for users who are looking for free solutions.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve due to the extensive customization and advanced features that may not be immediately intuitive.
  • System Integration
    Occasional issues with integration into the macOS system updates, requiring updates and maintenance from the developers.
  • Limited Trial
    The trial period or free version might be too limited for some users to fully evaluate the software before making a purchase.
  • Compatibility
    Some users might experience compatibility issues with certain third-party applications or older versions of macOS, impacting overall usability.

Flow features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Flow offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate through tasks, projects, and timelines. This reduces the learning curve and increases productivity.
  • Comprehensive Task Management
    The platform supports detailed task management features such as due dates, subtasks, and priorities, ensuring that users can stay on top of their responsibilities.
  • Team Collaboration
    Flow includes robust team collaboration tools like real-time updates, commenting, and file sharing, which facilitate effective communication and team workflow.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize their workflows to suit their project needs, which provides flexibility and adaptability for various types of projects.
  • Integrations
    Flow integrates with many other popular tools and services such as Slack, Google Drive, and Dropbox, allowing for seamless operations across different platforms.

Possible disadvantages of Flow

  • Cost
    Flow is a premium service with a subscription fee, which can be a drawback for small businesses or individuals looking for a free task management solution.
  • Limited Reporting
    The reporting and analytics features in Flow are not as advanced as some competitors’, which may be a downside for users looking for in-depth project insights.
  • Mobile App Limitations
    Some users have reported that the mobile app lacks certain features available on the web version, which can be inconvenient when on-the-go.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, some of the more advanced features can be complex and require time to master.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based service, Flow requires an internet connection to access its features, which can be a limitation for users in areas with poor connectivity.

uBar videos

Amouage "UBAR WOMAN" Fragrance Review

More videos:

  • Review - etrailer | Kuat Ubar Bike Frame Adapter Bar Review

Flow videos

flOw Review (PS4) - Learning To Love PlayStation

More videos:

  • Review - FLOW BY MIHALY CSIKSZENTMIHALYI | ANIMATED BOOK SUMMARY
  • Review - flOw review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to uBar and Flow)
Window Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100
OSX Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
7 7%
93% 93

User comments

Share your experience with using uBar and Flow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare uBar and Flow

uBar Reviews

We have no reviews of uBar yet.
Be the first one to post

Flow Reviews

The 10 Best Free Wrike Alternatives To Use in 2020 (Free & Trial)
The last spot in this roundup of free Wrike alternatives goes to Flow. Flow is a rather simplistic alternative solution to Wrike. If you feel Wrike’s features are overwhelming and too complicated for your team, Flow is the right tool to go for!
The Top 9 Wrike Alternatives For Project Management in 2019 (Free & Paid!)
Flow advertises itself as simple task management, and it’s exactly that. Tasks are arranged in an easy-to-follow way, letting users quickly update where they are. Their reporting on task and project progress is also a plus. It lets you know how far along a task is until it’s completed, and how each team member is contributing to it.
Source: clickup.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, uBar should be more popular than Flow. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

uBar mentions (10)

  • Is there a way to quickly restart open apps?
    Probably overkill, especially given it's a paid app, but uBar (Dock replacement) has a shortcut that restarts an app: cmd+shift+click on the app icon. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Apple Silicon Is an Inconvenient Truth
    I use uBar, you can have all windows ungrouped on the bar and it should have the title for each window. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Finally seeing the draw to Mac...
    There's always Ubar for an alt to the dock. It's Windows-esq. Https://brawersoftware.com/products/ubar. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How to make easier MacOS for my mom long time user of Windows?
    UBar could help quite a bit. It replaces the MacOS dock with a Windows-style taskbar. That along with Start, which is basically a Windows Start Menu for the Mac, and she should be good to go. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Multiple MacOS Docks or MacOS Dock Alternatives
    Here is what I´ve found elsewhere: uBar - Cost 30$ - I havent tested this, purely because I doubt I would be paying 30 bux for a dock, also from screenshots, it seems to be tailored to looking like a windows taskbar, which I am not looking for. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Flow mentions (1)

  • What's your client management process?
    We use getflow.com for internal task management and email + meetings with clients. Tried tons of client facing tools and it never works. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing uBar and Flow, you can also consider the following products

LayAuto - Automated window management for Mac ✨

Asana - Asana project management is an effort to re-imagine how we work together, through modern productivity software. Fast and versatile, Asana helps individuals and groups get more done.

Moom - Move your mouse over the green zoom button in any window, and Moom's mouse control overlay will appear (as seen in the above animation).

Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.

ActiveDock - Application Launcher, improved Dock for macOS, alternative to Apple Dock, uBar, HyperDock

Basecamp - A simple and elegant project management system.