Typography for Lawyers VS fonticons

Typography: This goes for both Applicants and Examiners—If possible, please stop sending in responses in double-spaced 12-pt Times New Roman with oversized tab indents and overusage of emphasizing (especially underlining). Such format provides for an awful reading experience, and it gives off a bad impression on your end. I highly recommend to both Examiners and Applicants to read... Source: about 1 year ago

Https://css-tricks.com/ https://typographyforlawyers.com/ Covers the basics with zero pretense Kevin Powell on YouTube has great css rutorials. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

There's some discussion at https://typographyforlawyers.com/ about the current state of things, rules and requirements, and how to improve things. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

If you want to learn stuff regarding formatting (generally, not Word specific), typographyforlawyers.com is free. Source: over 1 year ago

A great resource for lawyers (and for people who think lawyers typesetting/formatting choices have a deeper meaning) is Typography for Lawyers. https://typographyforlawyers.com/. Source: almost 2 years ago

> bundle it with something like https://fortawesome.com/ Using FA as a CDN is not GDPR compliant, either. Generally speaking using any public CDN is not GDPR compliant. If you _could_ self host the files, then you can not meet the necessity test required for any of the relevant legal basis in GDPR art 6(1). Google Fonts and FA are worse, because the personal data is shipped off wholesale to the USA. Neither FA or... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

+1 It's not even clear if using Google Fonts is GDPR compliant (since you're leaking the fact that your visitor has visited your website): https://github.com/google/fonts/issues/1495 Even if you do want to use your own custom pretty font on your site, just self host it, or bundle it with something like https://fortawesome.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago