Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TypingDNA Authenticator VS Reflect.net

Compare TypingDNA Authenticator VS Reflect.net and see what are their differences

TypingDNA Authenticator logo TypingDNA Authenticator

2FA codes in your browser, secured by the way you type

Reflect.net logo Reflect.net

High-performance sync for multiplayer web apps. Up to 120 FPS sync, automatic persistence, server authority, fine-grained auth, and more...
  • TypingDNA Authenticator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

100% FREE app

Not present

TypingDNA Authenticator features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    TypingDNA Authenticator adds an extra layer of security by using behavioral biometrics, making it harder for unauthorized users to gain access.
  • User Convenience
    Since users are already familiar with typing, this method is intuitive and non-intrusive, reducing friction in the authentication process.
  • Reduced Dependency on Physical Devices
    Unlike hardware tokens or mobile-based 2FA, behavioral biometrics do not require any additional devices, minimizing logistical challenges and costs.
  • Continuous Authentication
    Typing biometrics can be used for continuous authentication, not just at login, enhancing ongoing security throughout a user's session.
  • Low False Positive Rate
    Behavioral biometrics usually offer a low false positive rate, improving the reliability of the authentication system.

Possible disadvantages of TypingDNA Authenticator

  • Privacy Concerns
    The use of behavioral biometrics raises privacy concerns as it involves collecting and analyzing personal behavioral data which could be sensitive or misused.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Implementing TypingDNA Authenticator can require a complex initial setup and integration with existing systems, demanding technical expertise and resources.
  • User Adaptation
    Users may exhibit different typing behaviors over time due to various factors such as stress or injury, potentially affecting the accuracy of authentication.
  • Not Universally Applicable
    Typing biometrics may not be suitable for all user populations, particularly those who may have difficulties with typing, such as individuals with disabilities.
  • Cost
    While reducing dependency on physical devices, TypingDNA services may come with subscription costs that could be a concern for small organizations or individual users.

Reflect.net features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

TypingDNA Authenticator videos

How to set up GitHub two factor authentication with TypingDNA Authenticator

Reflect.net videos

#2 – Aaron Boodman: From Google Gears to Replicache & Reflect.net

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TypingDNA Authenticator and Reflect.net)
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
69 69%
31% 31
Identity And Access Management
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TypingDNA Authenticator and Reflect.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Reflect.net should be more popular than TypingDNA Authenticator. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TypingDNA Authenticator mentions (1)

  • I created this dummy website that is using typing biometrics as 2FA. Let me know what you think.
    You can play around with the solution by creating an account on typingdna.com and see for yourself. Source: almost 4 years ago

Reflect.net mentions (3)

  • Automerge: A library of data structures for building collaborative applications
    In a recent (abandoned) project, I used Reflect: https://reflect.net/ It was by far the most developer-friendly experience I've had trying to implement collaborative editing. The one thing it didn't have that YJS did was built-in undo/redo. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Are Sync Engines The Future of Web Applications?
    Crazy plot twist (last minute edit): As I was about to publish this post I discovered that Replicache is going to be opened sourced in the near future and that its parent company is planning to launch a new sync-engine called "Zero". Here is the official announcement. It reads: "We will be open sourcing Replicache and Reflect. Once Zero is ready, we will encourage users to move." Ironically, Zero seems to be yet... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • How I built a Multiplayer App in 3 days
    As the Monday began I started reading documentation and looking into the tech I wanted to use. For most of the stack I went with things I know. But for the multiplayer part I had to read up and understand the core concepts behind Replicache. While reading I came across their hosted service Reflect. This was a perfect fit as time was of the essence and I would not have to build my own Replicache backend! It's... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TypingDNA Authenticator and Reflect.net, you can also consider the following products

Authenticator Hub - How to enable 2 step verification for your accounts? Check our step-by-step guides to easily activate 2FA in all your accounts.

Liveblocks - Build amazing real‑time collaborative products

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

Dock.io - Web3 auth that puts user privacy first - and it’s free!

Microsoft Authenticator - One app to quickly and securely verify your identity online, for all of your accounts.

Nifty - Manage projects, work, and communications in one place.