Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TypingDNA Authenticator VS authzed

Compare TypingDNA Authenticator VS authzed and see what are their differences

TypingDNA Authenticator logo TypingDNA Authenticator

2FA codes in your browser, secured by the way you type

authzed logo authzed

The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions
  • TypingDNA Authenticator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

100% FREE app

  • authzed Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-22

TypingDNA Authenticator features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    TypingDNA Authenticator adds an extra layer of security by using behavioral biometrics, making it harder for unauthorized users to gain access.
  • User Convenience
    Since users are already familiar with typing, this method is intuitive and non-intrusive, reducing friction in the authentication process.
  • Reduced Dependency on Physical Devices
    Unlike hardware tokens or mobile-based 2FA, behavioral biometrics do not require any additional devices, minimizing logistical challenges and costs.
  • Continuous Authentication
    Typing biometrics can be used for continuous authentication, not just at login, enhancing ongoing security throughout a user's session.
  • Low False Positive Rate
    Behavioral biometrics usually offer a low false positive rate, improving the reliability of the authentication system.

Possible disadvantages of TypingDNA Authenticator

  • Privacy Concerns
    The use of behavioral biometrics raises privacy concerns as it involves collecting and analyzing personal behavioral data which could be sensitive or misused.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Implementing TypingDNA Authenticator can require a complex initial setup and integration with existing systems, demanding technical expertise and resources.
  • User Adaptation
    Users may exhibit different typing behaviors over time due to various factors such as stress or injury, potentially affecting the accuracy of authentication.
  • Not Universally Applicable
    Typing biometrics may not be suitable for all user populations, particularly those who may have difficulties with typing, such as individuals with disabilities.
  • Cost
    While reducing dependency on physical devices, TypingDNA services may come with subscription costs that could be a concern for small organizations or individual users.

authzed features and specs

  • Fine-Grained Access Control
    Authzed provides fine-grained access control via its Zanau authorization system, allowing for highly specific permissions and access rules tailored to complex requirements.
  • Scalability
    Authzed is designed to handle large-scale applications and supports millions of users and permissions scenarios efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Authzed offers an open-source approach with SpiceDB, allowing developers to contribute and adapt the platform to their specific needs while benefiting from community support.
  • API-Driven
    The platform is API-driven, offering seamless integration with existing systems and technologies, making it easier for developers to incorporate into their architectures.
  • Cloud-Native
    Designed for modern cloud environments, Authzed supports cloud-native development practices, such as containerization and microservices architectures.

Possible disadvantages of authzed

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its detailed and customizable features, there is a steep learning curve associated with implementing Authzed, which may require more time and resources initially.
  • Complexity
    The system's capability for fine-grained permissions can add complexity to integration and management, potentially complicating simpler authorization needs.
  • Documentation Depth
    While improvements are continuously made, the documentation might not be as comprehensive or beginner-friendly as some users require, potentially complicating onboarding for new users.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Utilizing Authzed as an external service may introduce dependencies and concerns about service stability, uptime, and third-party management.
  • Early Stage
    As a relatively new entrant in the authorization space, some potential users may be hesitant to adopt Authzed due to concerns over the maturity and long-term support of the platform.

TypingDNA Authenticator videos

How to set up GitHub two factor authentication with TypingDNA Authenticator

authzed videos

No authzed videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TypingDNA Authenticator and authzed)
APIs
66 66%
34% 34
Developer Tools
45 45%
55% 55
Identity And Access Management
Security
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TypingDNA Authenticator and authzed. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, authzed should be more popular than TypingDNA Authenticator. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TypingDNA Authenticator mentions (1)

  • I created this dummy website that is using typing biometrics as 2FA. Let me know what you think.
    You can play around with the solution by creating an account on typingdna.com and see for yourself. Source: almost 4 years ago

authzed mentions (9)

  • Open Policy Agent
    Https://docs.opal.ac/ Universally, people I've met and worked with (20-30) hate writing rego (OPA). I'm always skeptical of Styra's analysis; they are literally selling you something. AuthZed looks interesting and they have good "ride along" videos in YouTube, e.g. Replicating GitHub auth. https://authzed.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Understanding Google Zanzibar and Why Shines at Building Permissions
    Plugging another company that's been implementing Google-Zanzibar-like auth tech: https://authzed.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • The developer’s guide to IAM buzzwords
    Leading Authorization services include: ⁠Permit.io, AuthZed, Ory Keto, Styra DAS. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Permissions (access control) in web apps
    Https://authzed.com/ (Provider) AuthZed brings a specialized SpiceDB permissions database which they use as a centralized place for storing and managing rules. Then, you can use their SDKs to query, store, and validate application permissions. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2022)
    Authzed (YC W21) | Senior Site-Reliability Engineer (SRE) | NYC, Remote USA | Full-Time | https://authzed.com/ 20 milliseconds at the 99.5 percentile and five-nines (99.999) of uptime. Those are our goals for our globally-distributed permissions system as a service. If you’re interested in helping us achieve these goals, we would like to talk. We’re currently using best-in-class open source solutions on the public... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TypingDNA Authenticator and authzed, you can also consider the following products

Authenticator Hub - How to enable 2 step verification for your accounts? Check our step-by-step guides to easily activate 2FA in all your accounts.

Aserto - Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

Cerbos - Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.

Microsoft Authenticator - One app to quickly and securely verify your identity online, for all of your accounts.

Oso - A batteries-included system for authorization.