Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TypingDNA Authenticator VS Authentication

Compare TypingDNA Authenticator VS Authentication and see what are their differences

TypingDNA Authenticator logo TypingDNA Authenticator

2FA codes in your browser, secured by the way you type

Authentication logo Authentication

A strong Multi-Factor authentication (MFA) solution with advanced biometrics.
  • TypingDNA Authenticator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

100% FREE app

  • Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-31

TypingDNA Authenticator features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    TypingDNA Authenticator adds an extra layer of security by using behavioral biometrics, making it harder for unauthorized users to gain access.
  • User Convenience
    Since users are already familiar with typing, this method is intuitive and non-intrusive, reducing friction in the authentication process.
  • Reduced Dependency on Physical Devices
    Unlike hardware tokens or mobile-based 2FA, behavioral biometrics do not require any additional devices, minimizing logistical challenges and costs.
  • Continuous Authentication
    Typing biometrics can be used for continuous authentication, not just at login, enhancing ongoing security throughout a user's session.
  • Low False Positive Rate
    Behavioral biometrics usually offer a low false positive rate, improving the reliability of the authentication system.

Possible disadvantages of TypingDNA Authenticator

  • Privacy Concerns
    The use of behavioral biometrics raises privacy concerns as it involves collecting and analyzing personal behavioral data which could be sensitive or misused.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Implementing TypingDNA Authenticator can require a complex initial setup and integration with existing systems, demanding technical expertise and resources.
  • User Adaptation
    Users may exhibit different typing behaviors over time due to various factors such as stress or injury, potentially affecting the accuracy of authentication.
  • Not Universally Applicable
    Typing biometrics may not be suitable for all user populations, particularly those who may have difficulties with typing, such as individuals with disabilities.
  • Cost
    While reducing dependency on physical devices, TypingDNA services may come with subscription costs that could be a concern for small organizations or individual users.

Authentication features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of TypingDNA Authenticator

Overall verdict

  • TypingDNA Authenticator is generally considered a good option for biometric authentication through typing biometrics.

Why this product is good

  • TypingDNA Authenticator enhances security by using unique typing patterns to verify identity, making it difficult for unauthorized users to replicate.
  • It provides an additional layer of security beyond traditional passwords and two-factor authentication methods.
  • The solution is non-intrusive and user-friendly, making it an attractive option for both individuals and businesses looking for seamless authentication processes.

Recommended for

  • Businesses seeking to improve their cybersecurity measures without compromising user experience.
  • Individuals who prefer advanced security options that integrate easily into their daily workflows.
  • Organizations looking to implement multi-factor authentication solutions that do not rely solely on physical devices like phones or tokens.

TypingDNA Authenticator videos

How to set up GitHub two factor authentication with TypingDNA Authenticator

Authentication videos

3 MISTAKES You're Making with 2-Factor Authentication (2FA)

More videos:

  • Review - STOP USING 2-Factor Authentication!
  • Review - STOP using this Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) method!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TypingDNA Authenticator and Authentication)
Identity And Access Management
Developer Tools
74 74%
26% 26
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
API
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TypingDNA Authenticator and Authentication. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, TypingDNA Authenticator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TypingDNA Authenticator mentions (1)

  • I created this dummy website that is using typing biometrics as 2FA. Let me know what you think.
    You can play around with the solution by creating an account on typingdna.com and see for yourself. Source: almost 4 years ago

Authentication mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Authentication yet. Tracking of Authentication recommendations started around Mar 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TypingDNA Authenticator and Authentication, you can also consider the following products

Authenticator Hub - How to enable 2 step verification for your accounts? Check our step-by-step guides to easily activate 2FA in all your accounts.

Amazon Cognito - Amazon Cognito lets you add user sign-up, sign-in, and access control to your web and mobile apps quickly and easily. It scales to millions of users and supports sign-in with social identity providers and enterprise identity providers via SAML 2.0.

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

Authorizer - Authorizer is an open-source authentication and authorization solution for your applications.

Microsoft Authenticator - One app to quickly and securely verify your identity online, for all of your accounts.

Open Collective - Recurring funding for groups.